From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwgAX-0007bD-F9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:13:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwgAW-0007bB-FB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:13:57 -0400 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:42860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwgAW-0007b5-99 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 18:13:56 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e39.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:03:42 -0600 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438396E803A for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:03:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r69M3ZxM310278 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:03:36 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r69M3VZF019411 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:03:32 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: References: <1371645291-3178-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <874nc337gq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <51DC5DEA.4060901@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <87li5fsbrd.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87y59f1l71.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:03:11 -0500 Message-ID: <87hag3bdcw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] display: stop using DT_NOGRAPHIC, use DT_NONE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Peter Maydell writes: > On 9 July 2013 22:24, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Peter Maydell writes: >>> Why the heck are we telling the guest that the user >>> specified -nographic anyhow? It's a dumb guest ABI... >> >> I believe OpenBIOS uses this to determine if it should display messages >> on serial or on the graphic display. >> >> It's actually a useful ABI in that regard. > > OK, I might go for "useful but misnamed"; we should > presumably have a command line option to set it > cleanly (ie independently of display type), and add > that to the list of random things -nographic does... I wouldn't be opposed to that but whatever we do, it should be documented and should not break 'make check'. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > -- PMM