From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci: apply voltage range check only for non-fixed regulators Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:48:59 -0500 Message-ID: <87hao7f344.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> References: <25B60CDC2F704E4E9D88FFD52780CB4C060FBEA29A@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com> <50AB34E2.1010206@samsung.com> <50AB587F.3040405@samsung.com> <50AB81C8.4090300@samsung.com> <50AB9B90.1030404@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:48805 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756580Ab2K3QtK (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:49:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <50AB9B90.1030404@samsung.com> (Marek Szyprowski's message of "Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:02:40 +0100") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Kevin Liu , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, Mark Brown , lrg@ti.com, Philip Rakity Hi Marek, On Tue, Nov 20 2012, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > The problem with dummy regulator is the fact that it can be enabled only > globally for all devices in the system. I think that the best solution > would be to introduce regulator_can_change_voltage() as Mark suggested. > I will post patches soon. Does this mean that I shouldn't merge either yours or Kevin's patch for 3.8, while we wait for this? Any ETA on it? Thanks very much, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child