From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: Move an interface to init_ne Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:28:43 -0600 Message-ID: <87hao9elok.fsf@xmission.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Renato Westphal , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Shwatrz Return-path: Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:41989 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752512Ab2K1Q2v (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:28:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: (David Shwatrz's message of "Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:31:15 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Shwatrz writes: > But when I run "modprobe 8139too" on namespace1, a device named "eth1" > is created on the initial network namespace and not on namesapce1. > I expected that in such a case, a device named "eth0" will be created > on namespace1, since it was called from namespace1. Or maybe modprobe > does > not consider the namespace from which it was called ? modprobe has no concept of the namespace from which it was called. Eric