From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:49:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Voipac PXA270: UDC and UHC support In-Reply-To: <201003101243.54008.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (Marek Vasut's message of "Wed\, 10 Mar 2010 12\:43\:53 +0100") References: <201003100543.00221.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201003101243.54008.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87hbol77lp.fsf@free.fr> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Marek Vasut writes: > Dne St 10. b?ezna 2010 05:43:00 Marek Vasut napsal(a): >> Hi, >> this patch adds UDC and UHC support (and formating fix, I hope you dont >> mind Eric). >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut >> > revised patch snip > +/****************************************************************************** > + * USB Gadget > + ******************************************************************************/ > +#if defined(CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA27X)||defined(CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA27X_MODULE) > +static struct pxa2xx_udc_mach_info vpac270_udc_info __initdata = { > + .gpio_vbus = GPIO41_VPAC270_UDC_DETECT, > +}; That won't work I think. gpio_vbus is not dealt with by pxa27x_udc. The way to go would rather be something like : #include static struct pxa2xx_udc_mach_info vpac270_udc_info __initdata = { .gpio_pullup = , }; struct gpio_vbus_mach_info gpio_vbus_data = { .gpio_vbus = GPIO41_VPAC270_UDC_DETECT, .gpio_vbus_inverted = 0, .gpio_pullup = -1, }; Add add a "gpio_vbus" device, with platform_data set to gpio_vbus_data. As a matter of fact, there are not a lot of cases where an UDC can work without : - a GPIO for pullup - or the udc_command() callback implemented The only working case I see is a hardwired D+ pin to the Vdd, but that seems an exterme in board design I've never met before. This lets me think you should find and the add the correct GPIO for pullup. Cheers. -- Robert