From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Chris Larson <clarson@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitbake.conf: rework FILESPATH generation.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:24:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hc2ps65l.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6ebd0a50902191627x48e60175o8f3e20e0a0bf2104@mail.gmail.com> (Chris Larson's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:27:34 -0700")
Chris Larson <clarson@kergoth.com> writes:
> Heh, already sent this reply out, but from the wrong email address.
> This time it should actually hit the list...
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:28:52PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>>> From: Chris Larson <clarson@mvista.com>
>>>
>>> Rework FILESPATH generation to be done in bitbake.conf, avoiding the
>>> confusion about it being in multiple places. Adds FILESPATHBASE and
>>> FILESPATHPKG which can be manipulated rather than manipulating FILESPATH
>>> directly.
>>>
>>> One usage possibility:
>>>
>>> FILESPATHBASE =. "${TOPDIR}/files:"
>>>
>>> Which would let me provide a custom busybox config for this build by
>>> copying the defconfig from the openembedded metadata into my
>>> build/files/busybox-1.0/ directory, for example.
>>
>> Can you please provide more details on this example? Thanks.
>
> Normally, all paths in FILESPATH are relative to FILE_DIRNAME, the
> location of the recipe being operated against. With this change, you
> can place files which are in SRC_URI as file:// urls in paths relative
> to other locations.
>
> You can do package customizations via changes to file:// files without
> mucking up the local clone of the openembedded repository.
>
> My intent is to create a class to facilitate running make menuconfig
> on your kernel and busybox, and retain those changes. Today, people
> either go into workdir and customize it there, but those changes are
> lost when you clean the package, or they overwrite files in the
> metadata repository, which can lead to conflicts, and is just all
> around more annoying to work with. It's better to be able to have per
> build or site wide overrides of those files.
I second it; specially the "make menuconfig" feature :-)
I lose a kernel config yestarday by mistake due this :P
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 23:28 [PATCH] bitbake.conf: rework FILESPATH generation Chris Larson
2009-02-19 23:41 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
[not found] ` <A1953057-56C2-4B3D-BF40-9778AC3D9139@mvista.com>
2009-02-20 0:06 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-02-20 0:27 ` Chris Larson
2009-02-20 0:58 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-20 11:24 ` Otavio Salvador [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hc2ps65l.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br \
--to=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
--cc=clarson@mvista.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.