From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [200.17.161.174] (helo=listas.ossystems.com.br) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LPdmo-0006Ps-SH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:10:31 +0100 Received: from internet.ossystems.com.br (201-40-162-47.cable.viacabocom.com.br [201.40.162.47]) by listas.ossystems.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A92F400E5; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:04:18 -0200 (BRST) Received: from ossystems.com.br (unknown [10.1.0.243]) by internet.ossystems.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1450740BC; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:03:21 -0200 (BRST) Received: by ossystems.com.br (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C3236101B8; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:58:06 -0200 (BRST) To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20090120190022.GD30203@smtp.west.cox.net> From: Otavio Salvador Organization: O.S. Systems Ltda. X-URL: http://www.debian.org/~otavio/ X-Attribution: O.S. Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:58:06 -0200 In-Reply-To: (Cliff Brake's message of "Wed\, 21 Jan 2009 08\:29\:05 -0500") Message-ID: <87hc3s2235.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Subject: Re: OE weekly changelog 2009-01-12 to 2009-01-19 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:10:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cliff Brake writes: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:40:03AM -0500, Cliff Brake wrote: >> >>> OE weekly changelog 2009-01-12 to 2009-01-19 >> >> Hmm, this missed pulling in rpurdie/canadian-sofar into the main branch. > > Thanks for pointing that out -- I'll see if I can update the script to > included merges like that. Personally I think that it is better to keep --no-merges otherwise it will be poluted and it won't give you the idea of what was pulled anyway. If someone wants to know where something has been introduced, it is much better to use gitk or similar. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."