From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:55:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hc6fpwof.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081110080436.GF2093@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:04:36 +0100")
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
>
> No good ideas - the bug description gives me the impression of memory
> maps save/restore hickup in the hibernation code - and memory maps are
> pretty much the only thing that are significantly different on NUMA.
I assume the problem happened on a single node system.
On single node the memory map should be actually quite similar
to the UMA case.
One possibility would be to bisect if it ever worked?
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-10 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-09 14:07 CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 7:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 7:55 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 8:28 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 18:05 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-10 18:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-10 19:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-10 12:55 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-11-10 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 10:30 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 10:45 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 14:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-11 15:03 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-11 16:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-12 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:22 ` [PATCH] x86: Hibernate: Fix breakage on x86_32 with CONFIG_NUMA set (was: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:26 ` [PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-12 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-12 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-12 22:29 ` [PATCH] x86: Hibernate: Fix breakage on x86_32 with CONFIG_NUMA set (was: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE) Ingo Molnar
2008-11-12 22:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 8:24 ` CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-11-10 8:27 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-10 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 18:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hc6fpwof.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.