From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1FYUBm-00022u-Ea for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:31:14 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYUBk-00022N-QQ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:31:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FYUBi-00021J-D6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:31:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FYUBi-000217-5f for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:31:10 -0400 Received: from [194.109.24.32] (helo=smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FYUEE-0000lt-K4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:33:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3PKV57q069649 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:31:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <200604252144.25598.okuji@enbug.org> From: Marco Gerards Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:32:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200604252144.25598.okuji@enbug.org> (Yoshinori K. Okuji's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:44:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87hd4hjt01.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: counting partitions in gpt partition map X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:31:13 -0000 "Yoshinori K. Okuji" writes: > Why does the gpt partition map count partitions from one instead of zero, > unlike other partition maps in GRUB? I don't object to changing the base > number to one in GRUB 2, but they should be at least consistent. This most likely would be a bug, if this is the case. I haven't really tested things on a partition map that is actually in use. Perhaps it's that or clumsiness that introduced this. IIRC the first partition is one with a special meaning, perhaps it is that? -- Marco