Re: [patch] v4l: bttv update

[Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>]

Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> writes:

> > -		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > -		schedule_timeout(HZ/50);
> > +		msleep(10);
> 
> My original patch used
> 
> msleep(20);
>
> Is there a reason the conversion was changed?

Doesn't really matter.  The code just polls in a loop until the status
register says the pll is locked.  Usually it needs one round only, so
the delay can be smaller to make the function return earlier ;)

  Gerd

-- 
return -ENOSIG;