All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
To: Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>,
	martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:20:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikadgx7x.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329140506.9595-2-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>

Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
>
> Replace per-kfunc btf_id chains check with btf_id_in_kfunc_table() and
> static kfunc tables for easier maintenance.
>
> Prepare for future extensions to the bpf_list API family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
> ---

I think old is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(kfunc_btf_id) is more readable than new
btf_id_in_kfunc_table(kfunc_btf_id, bpf_rbtree_api_kfuncs);
Not sure if this change should be bundled with this series, it looks
quite orthogonal.

>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 4fbacd2149cd..f2d9863bb290 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -544,9 +544,6 @@ static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
>  static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
>  static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn);
>  
> -static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
> -static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id);
> -
>  static bool is_sync_callback_calling_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
>  {
>  	return func_id == BPF_FUNC_for_each_map_elem ||
> @@ -586,7 +583,7 @@ static bool is_async_cb_sleepable(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn
>  
>  	/* bpf_wq and bpf_task_work callbacks are always sleepable. */
>  	if (bpf_pseudo_kfunc_call(insn) && insn->off == 0 &&
> -	    (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(insn->imm) || is_task_work_add_kfunc(insn->imm)))
> +	    is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(insn->imm))
>  		return true;
>  
>  	verifier_bug(env, "unhandled async callback in is_async_cb_sleepable");
> @@ -11203,31 +11200,6 @@ static int set_task_work_schedule_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> ...
> -- 
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-30 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-29 14:04 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-30 15:20   ` Mykyta Yatsenko [this message]
2026-03-30 17:05   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03 17:41     ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-04  4:49       ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-04 10:38         ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-07 18:40           ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-10  2:53             ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-23 23:25               ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:45   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of bpf_list_add_impl Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ikadgx7x.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.