From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5F4FEFB7C for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vw32K-0006KQ-C3; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:58:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vw32I-0006K2-P7 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:58:02 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vw32H-0003fQ-7a for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 13:58:02 -0500 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1003F834; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:57:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1772218679; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aWCZ9qBqV2k5e4A2hKTflr8hIwiOiaVsUjptDR5jARY=; b=RC7CFKSS2AiScByNZZX0kZ9n3xM/GvpFtFe1LQKFU355CEWVpm+ZbCawPTAkED+CWH7qYN oV4o4SexAyEAcp2Q4DcIRDi6jQHBAxj47sMpziGlIg+HwmZJ6Msf3duu6EjZL9/8TbY6tg lcEboOC1GK2q0BYvz80StOK91e7sJ4g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1772218679; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aWCZ9qBqV2k5e4A2hKTflr8hIwiOiaVsUjptDR5jARY=; b=XKD4RYhvTt9G0r2pa2zbbs7s1VvWDnt3lw/wxNT8U9amg46rMqb0seXyp556ckJUeDdxtY 3zq+EonsjTl4PkDA== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1772218678; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aWCZ9qBqV2k5e4A2hKTflr8hIwiOiaVsUjptDR5jARY=; b=GXlTG0CpHYpQMjMSLhJL6fab7s/+7TZ6BRCfjmvVE3rpy8dCc3qmBVdpeUSYqNdNv4OoVM fjdi4I9+irGU7VEDx4GuDPNTRJUKcKWYdFQTSxHlSmC0qu7Aod1S4ZXpsErO72Jvx4w3yL 7Xhc259qcvoH1idE8pbKCTfw/T9h9PE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1772218678; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aWCZ9qBqV2k5e4A2hKTflr8hIwiOiaVsUjptDR5jARY=; b=Z1pBQtGww3y/PGJC/NpcoTP2aQnufYvL1kCC2HQAQnJra9Lzk62nFVhSiB09myLuN21H2b 7ACnIg59pq7kz5AQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D303EA69; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id IWkLDjbpoWnsEQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:57:58 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: Peter Maydell , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt: Add more leaks In-Reply-To: <20260227135736.2280161-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org> References: <20260227135736.2280161-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <20260227135736.2280161-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:57:55 -0300 Message-ID: <87ikbi580c.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:mid, suse.de:email, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, linaro.org:email] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Peter Maydell writes: > Running "make check" with the clang leak sanitizer reveals some > leak reports which are either not our problem or else not > a leak which is worth our time to fix. Add some suppressions > for these. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas FYI, mine has these. The first one is on my list to fix once I find some time. The last two seem to be part of the stack for the ones you added here. leak:qcrypto_tls_session_push leak:gnutls_handshake leak:memory_region_do_init leak:qos_traverse_graph leak:qdev_get_named_gpio_list > --- > scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt b/scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt > index ffade3ba5a..bd6ef07079 100644 > --- a/scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt > +++ b/scripts/lsan_suppressions.txt > @@ -9,3 +9,23 @@ leak:/lib64/libtcmalloc_minimal.so.4 > > # libxkbcommon also leaks in qemu-keymap > leak:/lib64/libxkbcommon.so.0 > + > +# g_set_user_dirs() deliberately leaks the previous cached g_get_user_* > +# values. This is documented in upstream glib's valgrind-format > +# suppression file: > +# https://github.com/GNOME/glib/blob/main/tools/glib.supp > +# This avoids false positive leak reports for the qga-ssh-test. > +leak:g_set_user_dirs > + > +# The walk_path() function in qos-test does free its memory, > +# but something about the setup with tests run in a subprocess > +# seems to confuse the sanitizer. Suppress the errors. > +leak:walk_path > + > +# qemu_irq_intercept_in is only used by the qtest harness, and > +# its API inherently involves a leak. > +# While we could keep track of the old IRQ data structure > +# in order to free it, it doesn't seem very important to fix > +# since it is only used by the qtest test harness. > +# Just ignore the leak, at least for the moment. > +leak:qemu_irq_intercept_in