From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A2529C351; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 23:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751586618; cv=none; b=Wddn/VlL/WOg4gVXJY2Wmcs+tMWmLoeaQXBKWlDU5QLWIfxfDQvb1fXCLiODx5DH0fmz6LHozvK4+fw72KXwbHG6gfkpyqmiC31xWT+jrbhVlgg9mCYfU69+GgXqqmx8kKTOMQiBp0rLyGJO9kTQ/n7h3/B1K3lKd5WG4SwUP5c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751586618; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Oe3QQgJWZ56o+ycCPLVB9VISYiwHmlWi1PPZPZiKgDU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pyR342JzoVcU9LWs6LLmkLHP8TOckjO5Mh8WwCTYHnooVyT0fS/1qe48wPlM+V9FTmVtG965nwTMeZaHMSlOZHZNZ7dl8/IR6oh7OdaKeGKw5Pew5Zxn3C1JLekXqwjyf5h5l1TdANzV8NV/HJx47knCq3MkeFiUxfgHTuuaD0I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=rbMoDk4l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="rbMoDk4l" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3F132406FC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1751586615; bh=+Ni/Yq+mC3Wm6z94sO7qxNlDh19w0DmweAP27z8OY04=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=rbMoDk4ltkPAM5BEdVehqCcjN6UZOIpoYY2qbarlNVf6CjlIyA2Vk0eaWTRW58JP1 JntEayhrA+rX2W9vHKzt4eNO7kOSXE0KRafluWfMSJDdZ6Gfc1Km6kQ/Ml4uZDWuk0 mh0wQynn+iGx7d0Qy/Mpr/QPFYidmtE8a2wqcznQZrMEzVqiXAulg6juvKFSEdATR8 G5mPeOGWNuuTzsBkZMO0xzQpIVAzxpWreHZORm9D0+oIWiQ/dh11sSAFGdsnruxbJL sfA2RazHRHrU1pZlOxJH+4q6LjQ6vN5+oQktvSUfGolb5AxdLRPv4m+hB/W5IWOKsq rkvgUv09qS6KA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F132406FC; Thu, 3 Jul 2025 23:50:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Carlos Bilbao , Bagas Sanjaya Cc: Vegard Nossum , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Federico Vaga , Akira Yokosawa , Carlos Bilbao , Avadhut Naik , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Dongliang Mu , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Stanislav Fomichev , David Vernet , Miguel Ojeda , James Seo , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Documentation: typography refresh In-Reply-To: References: <20250619042318.17325-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <75f99fce-affa-4acc-afeb-2a9f70a6d907@oracle.com> <250eb150-ef18-4e62-9791-f2ec4801cd39@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:50:14 -0600 Message-ID: <87ikk8kf61.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carlos Bilbao writes: > Some, we can talk about it, I=E2=80=99d personally like to see a small fl= ag > displayed to the left of the language options at the top button. If I understand you correctly, that's dangerous territory...flags and languages are fraught with all kinds of disagreement and discord. The conventional wisdom is to avoid the use of flags to represent languages. Thanks, jon