All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	workflows@vger.kernel.org,  tools@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/19] exec: add API specification for execve
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:39:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikkvv018.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250614134858.790460-9-sashal@kernel.org> (Sasha Levin's message of "Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:48:47 -0400")

* Sasha Levin:

> +	KAPI_RETURN("long", "Does not return on success; returns -1 on error")
> +		.type = KAPI_TYPE_INT,
> +		.check_type = KAPI_RETURN_ERROR_CHECK,
> +	KAPI_RETURN_END

Is the -1 part correct?

Many later errors during execve are not recoverable and result in execve
succeeding (nominally) and a fatal signal being delivered to the process
instead.  Not sure if the description covers that.

What about the effect of unblocking a parent thread that has vfork'ed?

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-14 13:48 [RFC 00/19] Kernel API Specification Framework Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 01/19] kernel/api: introduce kernel API specification framework Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 02/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_create1 Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 03/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_create Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 04/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_ctl Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 05/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_wait Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 06/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_pwait Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 07/19] eventpoll: add API specification for epoll_pwait2 Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 08/19] exec: add API specification for execve Sasha Levin
2025-06-16 21:39   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2025-06-17  1:51     ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-17  7:13       ` Florian Weimer
2025-06-17 22:58         ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 09/19] exec: add API specification for execveat Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 10/19] mm/mlock: add API specification for mlock Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 11/19] mm/mlock: add API specification for mlock2 Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 12/19] mm/mlock: add API specification for mlockall Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 13/19] mm/mlock: add API specification for munlock Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 14/19] mm/mlock: add API specification for munlockall Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 15/19] kernel/api: add debugfs interface for kernel API specifications Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 16/19] kernel/api: add IOCTL specification infrastructure Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 17/19] fwctl: add detailed IOCTL API specifications Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 18/19] binder: " Sasha Levin
2025-06-14 13:48 ` [RFC 19/19] tools/kapi: Add kernel API specification extraction tool Sasha Levin
2025-06-17 12:08 ` [RFC 00/19] Kernel API Specification Framework David Laight
2025-06-18 21:29 ` Kees Cook
2025-06-19  0:22   ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-23 13:28     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-24 14:06       ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-06-24 14:30         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-24 15:27           ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-06-24 20:04       ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-25  8:49         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-25  8:52         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-25 15:46           ` Cyril Hrubis
2025-06-25 15:55           ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-26  8:32             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-26  8:37               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-26 16:23                 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-27  6:23                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-30 14:27                     ` Sasha Levin
2025-07-01  6:11                       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-25  8:56         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-25 16:23           ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ikkvv018.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=tools@kernel.org \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.