From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10832C2BA15 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJB4c-0008SO-Jy; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:02:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJB4S-0008RN-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:02:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJB4P-0001o4-GC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:02:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718625763; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=l1ZpAb/wn44XrchjUzZ/TXnIKUVrqz6gutVzuvMieDA=; b=QlwkzYB4MC4kanLHNrzFpqYbgCMQ79VAh8pANso5q9K3b1veqwPuSTLMyIZDzEbiZiWutZ xH6cgxjy4vWRMVF/HhqwzINlVG17+hxRVEnqt9cCJ9aNeh9gkae0BaXhY8CjDi9snHaqoK TcEjqwAHO1OBgfzy0xOrppmceEShUfc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-117-syqApElrM4CpngTVAoUWTQ-1; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:02:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: syqApElrM4CpngTVAoUWTQ-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07D419560B6; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.93]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159B81955E80; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD50221E6757; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:02:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz , Brad Smith , Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Lureau , Laurent Vivier , gmaglione@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Coiby Xu , Gerd Hoffmann , slp@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , Raphael Norwitz , Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , David Hildenbrand , Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Jason Wang , Eric Blake Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 00/12] vhost-user: support any POSIX system (tested on macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD) In-Reply-To: (Stefano Garzarella's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:35:47 +0200") References: <20240612130140.63004-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:02:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87iky7eq09.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 11 X-Spam_score: 1.1 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Stefano Garzarella writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 03:01:28PM GMT, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>This series should be in a good shape, in which tree should we queue it? >>@Micheal would your tree be okay? > > Markus suggested a small change to patch 10, so do you want me to resend the whole series, or is it okay to resend just the last 3 patches (which are also the ones that depend on the other patch queued by Markus)? I guess you mean [PATCH v2] qapi: clarify that the default is backend dependent Message-ID: <20240611130231.83152-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> > In the last case I would ask you to queue up the first 9 patches of this series if that is okay with you. Michael, feel free to merge the patch I queued.