From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yhs@meta.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
david.faust@oracle.com, cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: abstract loop unrolling pragmas in BPF selftests
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il2zdl43.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eea74ef852fc57e9fb69d18e1e5960523c4f7abb.camel@gmail.com> (Eduard Zingerman's message of "Thu, 08 Feb 2024 17:28:04 +0200")
> On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 16:05 +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 13:55 +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > However, it would be good if some clang wizard could confirm what
>> > > impact, if any, #pragma unroll (aka #pragma clang loop unroll(enabled))
>> > > has over -O2, before ditching these pragmas from the selftests.
>> >
>> > I compiled sefltests both with and without this patch,
>> > there are no differences in disassembly of generated BPF object files.
>> > (using current clang main).
>> >
>> > [...]
>>
>> Hmm, wouldn't that mean that the loops in profiler.inc.h never get
>> unrolled regardless of optimization level or pragma? (profiler2.c)
>>
>
> No, the generated code is different between profiler{1,2,3}, e.g.:
>
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler1.bpf.o | wc -l
> 5356
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler2.bpf.o | wc -l
> 2329
> $ llvm-objdump -d before/profiler3.bpf.o | wc -l
> 1915
>
> What I meant, is that generated code for before/profiler1.bpf.o
> and after/profiler1.bpf.o is identical, etc.
Right. But profiler2.c before and after the patch do:
--- Before:
profiler2.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#define barrier_var(var) /**/
/* undef #define UNROLL */
#define INLINE /**/
#include "profiler.inc.h"
profiler.inc.h:
#ifdef UNROLL
#pragma unroll
#endif
for (WHATEVER) {
[...]
}
--- After:
profiler2.c:
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#define barrier_var(var) /**/
#define NO_UNROLL
#define INLINE /**/
#include "profiler.inc.h"
profiler.inc.h:
#ifdef NO_UNROLL
#pragma clang loop unroll(disable)
#endif
for (WHATEVER) {
[...]
}
---
If the compiler generates assembly code the same code for profile2.c for
before and after, that means that the loop does _not_ get unrolled when
profiler.inc.h is built with -O2 but without #pragma unroll.
But what if #pragma unroll is used? If it unrolls then, that would mean
that the pragma does something more than -funroll-loops/-O2.
Sorry if I am not making sense. Stuff like this confuses me to no end
;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 10:12 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: abstract loop unrolling pragmas in BPF selftests Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-07 21:45 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 11:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 12:55 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 14:18 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 15:05 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 15:28 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 15:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-02-08 15:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 16:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 18:04 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 18:35 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 18:59 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 19:03 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-02-08 19:34 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-02-08 19:44 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 19:49 ` Yonghong Song
2024-02-08 20:06 ` Jose E. Marchesi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87il2zdl43.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@meta.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.