From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
"Ryo ONODERA" <ryoon@netbsd.org>,
"Brad Smith" <brad@comstyle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:43:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilg0a55u.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39bc9b17-e6f2-ed1b-0d6d-31bbb98842cf@weilnetz.de> (Stefan Weil's message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2023 12:05:46 +0100")
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:36:41AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Which 32-bit hosts are still useful, and why?
>
>
> Citing my previous mail:
>
> I now checked all downloads of the latests installers since 2022-12-30.
>
> qemu-w32-setup-20221230.exe – 509 different IP addresses
> qemu-w64-setup-20221230.exe - 5471 different IP addresses
>
> 339 unique IP addresses are common for 32- and 64-bit, either
> crawlers or people who simply got both variants. So there remain 170
> IP addresses which only downloaded the 32-bit variant in the last week.
>
> I see 437 different strings for the browser type, but surprisingly
> none of them looks like a crawler.
>
> So there still seems to be a certain small need for QEMU installers for 32-bit Windows: 170 users für 32 bit only, 339 users for both 32 and 64 bit, 5132 users for 64 bit only.
Actual data is always welcome!
I wonder, though... given how decrepit 32-bit-only PCs must now be, and
how well Windows 10 (the only version still supporting them) runs on
these, how many downloaders of the w32 version could (and quite probably
should) use the w64 version instead?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 11:44 [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 11:47 ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-30 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 12:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 12:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 13:07 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 19:19 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-30 23:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 23:33 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-31 0:19 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 20:45 ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-05 22:12 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-04-04 14:00 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 14:20 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:58 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-04 14:32 ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:42 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-05 11:54 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 12:51 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 15:50 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 21:01 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-02-22 9:11 ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22 9:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-22 12:28 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-22 13:37 ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-17 10:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-17 10:40 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 10:45 ` Claudio Fontana
2023-02-17 10:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 11:05 ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 11:43 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2023-02-17 11:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-19 11:27 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-19 12:12 ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-17 17:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-17 18:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-18 22:54 ` Jiaxun Yang
2023-02-17 19:49 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-17 16:06 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-17 17:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 18:22 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-19 11:07 ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-17 11:09 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilg0a55u.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=brad@comstyle.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=ryoon@netbsd.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.