From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, jstultz@google.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: NMI safe converter from a given time to monotonic
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:30:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilgsgl5f.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBSt2WH=zo0_tXNb_Q7waDazvcquXgexXqqn=70A_f4H8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 24 2023 at 01:10, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:52 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> > It's useful to provide a NMI safe function to convert a given time to
>> > monotonic. For example, the perf_event subsystem wants to convert a TSC
>> > of a PEBS record to a monotonic clock in a NMI handler.
>>
>> Why? That's a postprocessing problem, really.
>>
> Because you want to correlate samples captured by PEBS with samples
> from applications timestamped with a user available clock such as
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC, for instance.
Sure. Postprocessing can do that if the kernel provides the relevant
conversion information. Absolutely no need for doing this in the kernel.
> When I create a perf_event event and I stipulate that
> event_attr.clockid=MONOTONIC, I expect all the samples from that event
> to be timestamped using the same clock source, regardless of PEBS or
> IBS.
Just because the kernel can do the conversion, there is no requirement
to actually do so. Instrumentation has to be as lightweight as possible
and a lot of instrumentation goes the extra mile of doing postprocessing
exactly for this reason.
So if we implement this conversion in the kernel then there needs to be
a compelling technical reason to do so.
So far the provided arguments are in the 'I want a pony' realm.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 18:27 [PATCH 0/3] Convert TSC to monotonic clock for PEBS kan.liang
2023-01-23 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: NMI safe converter from a given time to monotonic kan.liang
2023-01-24 7:01 ` John Stultz
2023-01-24 15:09 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-24 18:43 ` John Stultz
2023-01-24 20:12 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-24 20:33 ` John Stultz
2023-01-24 22:08 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-24 22:40 ` John Stultz
2023-01-25 16:44 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-24 8:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-01-24 9:10 ` Stephane Eranian
2023-01-24 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-27 13:30 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-01-23 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/tsc: Add set_tsc_system_counterval kan.liang
2023-01-23 18:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/ds: Support monotonic clock for PEBS kan.liang
2023-01-24 6:56 ` John Stultz
2023-01-24 15:17 ` Liang, Kan
2023-01-24 6:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] Convert TSC to " John Stultz
2023-01-24 15:04 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilgsgl5f.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.