All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RFC: printk: kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() buffer overflow
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 21:06:28 +0106	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87im8038v7.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)

Hello,

I have discovered that kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() is not allowed to
fill the full buffer that it is provided. It should leave at least 1
byte free so that callers can append a terminator.

Example from arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:

    kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock(&dumper, false, buf, sizeof(buf), &len);
    buf[len] = '\0';

This unusual behavior was not noticed and with commit 896fbe20b4e2
("printk: use the lockless ringbuffer") the implementation of
kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() was changed so that the full buffer can be
filled. This means that the two kmsg_dump_get_line*() users currently
can have a 1-byte buffer overflow.

This unusual kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() behavior seems to have been
accidentally introduced with commit 3ce9a7c0ac28 ("printk() - restore
prefix/timestamp printing for multi-newline strings"). Indeed, the
whitespace on the line that causes this behavior is not conform, leading
me to think it was a last-minute change or a typo. (The behavior is
caused by the ">=" instead of an expected ">".)

+    if (print_prefix(msg, syslog, NULL) +
+        text_len + 1>= size - len)
+            break;

Perhaps there was some paranoia involved because this same commit also
fixes a buffer overflow in the old implementation:

-    if (len + msg->text_len > size)
-            return -EINVAL;
-    memcpy(text + len, log_text(msg), msg->text_len);
-    len += msg->text_len;
-    text[len++] = '\n';

Anyways, we currently have this 1-byte buffer overflow in 5.10 and it
needs to be corrected. I see two possibilties.

1. We leave kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() as it is and modify the callers
   to properly terminate their buffer. This is my preferred
   approach. The patch would look like this:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index dcd817ca2edf..9c3faab3a7a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -3019,7 +3019,7 @@ dump_log_buf(void)
 
 	kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock(&dumper);
 	xmon_start_pagination();
-	while (kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock(&dumper, false, buf, sizeof(buf), &len)) {
+	while (kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock(&dumper, false, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, &len)) {
 		buf[len] = '\0';
 		printf("%s", buf);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c b/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
index e4abac6c9727..acc1b399fbe2 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static void kmsg_dumper_stdout(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper,
 		return;
 
 	printf("kmsg_dump:\n");
-	while (kmsg_dump_get_line(dumper, true, line, sizeof(line), &len)) {
+	while (kmsg_dump_get_line(dumper, true, line, sizeof(line) - 1, &len)) {
 		line[len] = '\0';
 		printf("%s", line);
 	}

2. We modify kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() so that it goes back to the
   unusual behavior. The patch would look like this:

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 848b56efc9d7..f0c03e432648 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3314,6 +3314,13 @@ bool kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper, bool syslog,
 	size_t l = 0;
 	bool ret = false;
 
+	/*
+	 * Callers expect this function to never fill more than
+	 * @size-1 bytes so reduce the provided size.
+	 */
+	if (size > 0)
+		size--;
+
 	prb_rec_init_rd(&r, &info, line, size);
 
 	if (!dumper->active)

Since kmsg_dump_get_line() is an exported symbol, my preferred approach
(which changes the semantics) may not be acceptible. In that case, we
can take the 2nd approach.

Please let me know your thoughts so I can post a patch for 5.10-stable
and 5.11-rc.

John Ogness

             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 20:00 John Ogness [this message]
2021-01-14 15:20 ` RFC: printk: kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() buffer overflow Petr Mladek
2021-01-14 16:00   ` John Ogness
2021-01-14 16:40     ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87im8038v7.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
    --to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.