From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:25:00 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Virtual/online Buildroot Developers meeting ? In-Reply-To: <20200713133634.350b9d23@windsurf.home> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:36:34 +0200") References: <20200711165315.0c2b5079@windsurf.home> <20200711165601.GA15448@scaer> <197f53b1-9c94-2697-0aff-4b80fdbc3a9c@mind.be> <20200713133634.350b9d23@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <87imeo1sz7.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Petazzoni writes: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:45:43 +0200 > Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: >> [Yes, I'm still alive :-) ] > Awesome, some of us were wondering ! :-) So am I, sorry about the slow response. >> >> - What format should it take ? One full day once in a while ? Just a >> >> few hours here and there ? Multiple days in a row ? >> > >> > My preference would be to block two or more days in a row. Sun-Mon ro >> > Sun-Tue would be ideal for me, but I can adapt. >> >> I also think it's easier to organise at least one and maybe several days in a >> row. For that, you clear your calendar, while if it's just for a couple of hours >> you tend not to do the effort. > On my side, I agree that doing full days is going to be easier than > just a few hours here and there. It also allows to focus on something a > bit more complex than what can be done in just 2-3 hours. Indeed. > However, the question is whether we want a few full days spread over > time, or grouped together. Or perhaps just have 2 meetings of 2 days > each, a few weeks apart ? I think 1, max 2 days is easiest to plan in. I have some free time late next week / early the week after, and will be away on holiday from 30/7 to 14/8. >> Here are the candidates that I've used and think are suitable (in no particular >> order): >> >> - jitsi >> - zoom >> - Google meet >> - discord >> - whereby > If that's needed, Bootlin has its own Jitsi installation, which we can > use. We've used it successfully to deliver 4 hours training courses, > over several days, and it works fine. I don't really have any preferences. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard