From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3138C433E0 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3402074B for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BE3402074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D776E940; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4C16E940 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:45:58 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: f5gXQIcVcOY/RCa2QCysTx21mvzEYg+W5bb2fUxnIS/LAaZv9qxSJ3xM3R5jlfFuGZqLjqIpFZ oGtgDuD5bH1A== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2020 08:45:58 -0700 IronPort-SDR: g7evTiMEYfKQBJ4zJ5SdnCSVQrdWx9BurOV5jn/ZMfhV7kaJCfqxEFe35rrUL86xw3t85IxQVu zrgFPqrtD/9g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,476,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="305098173" Received: from gaia.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.192]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2020 08:45:57 -0700 Received: by gaia.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 579965C2C59; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:43:26 +0300 (EEST) From: Mika Kuoppala To: Chris Wilson , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org In-Reply-To: <159137161429.22562.587818863316529518@build.alporthouse.com> References: <20200605122334.2798-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <20200605122334.2798-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <87o8pxa5og.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> <159137161429.22562.587818863316529518@build.alporthouse.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 18:43:26 +0300 Message-ID: <87img5a57l.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-06-05 16:33:19) >> Chris Wilson writes: >> >> > If any engine asks for the tasklet to be kicked from the CS interrupt, >> > do so. >> >> The why part is a bit thin. The plan is to use execlist tasklet >> for move stuff from virtual rings to real ones? > > Yes. I thought that part was self explanatory, since we're coupling up a > call to engine->execlists.tasklet if the engine opts into receiving the Reading further into series it is obvious, but you can carry the plot further in here already! "Aim is to mimic execlist port type submission and hopefully gain opportunities for code sharing"... Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala > interrupt. > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx