From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD768C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C70F206E6 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="WLZEwpJw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5C70F206E6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49H6JJ2D9XzDqsM for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:34:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49H62M1kYQzDqp7 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:19 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=WLZEwpJw; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49H62K5cz7z9sRY; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:17 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1588746138; bh=G3Z6HoHYd6geL9nF1n1OLlMWHSetC862Eqtc2CC7NUY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WLZEwpJwZOMApJCIktUBNCy+p6Eatb3o9IoiUEO/FKw5eAaoXrKRUaD64xYH33Swd sCMVcHP9OpWt6cJJbMpCEYFjIHme9Xd0ujWyzQydQTBCnQtASeOYis6+p6HcWbGx8o h0YREBz/jeLf32TI2tRVwz2YHH8H7d6648dK0DyiQ3E4BVKBfw3ye2kDJJHQR5u/xK tuXlXKGbS/z/7c8xjfWSuZbPZKQ0mU6gqdX4E9fofiFDtGB/y8eJLD7pmKIe/1Yl/f jzErh5ITSr8IOeqOylK20G3hHBKdPC6zyMn/YyL7v2zJhUHU81nFQlkGXp49Ozkj3l tFVMTmvmXIaEA== From: Michael Ellerman To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/5200: update contact email In-Reply-To: <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato> References: <20200502142642.18979-1-wsa@kernel.org> <877dxsdl5e.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato> Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 16:22:33 +1000 Message-ID: <87imh9d1li.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Paul Mackerras , kernel@pengutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Wolfram Sang writes: >> > My 'pengutronix' address is defunct for years. Merge the entries and use >> > the proper contact address. >> >> Is there any point adding the new address? It's just likely to bit-rot >> one day too. > > At least, this one is a group address, not an individual one, so less > likey. > >> I figure the git history is a better source for more up-to-date emails. > > But yes, can still be argued. I won't persist if you don't like it. That's fine, I'll merge this. You've already gone to the trouble to send it and it's better than what we have now. cheers From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C153C4724C for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DD12073A for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="WLZEwpJw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727094AbgEFGWV (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 02:22:21 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:57721 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726438AbgEFGWU (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 02:22:20 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49H62K5cz7z9sRY; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:17 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1588746138; bh=G3Z6HoHYd6geL9nF1n1OLlMWHSetC862Eqtc2CC7NUY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=WLZEwpJwZOMApJCIktUBNCy+p6Eatb3o9IoiUEO/FKw5eAaoXrKRUaD64xYH33Swd sCMVcHP9OpWt6cJJbMpCEYFjIHme9Xd0ujWyzQydQTBCnQtASeOYis6+p6HcWbGx8o h0YREBz/jeLf32TI2tRVwz2YHH8H7d6648dK0DyiQ3E4BVKBfw3ye2kDJJHQR5u/xK tuXlXKGbS/z/7c8xjfWSuZbPZKQ0mU6gqdX4E9fofiFDtGB/y8eJLD7pmKIe/1Yl/f jzErh5ITSr8IOeqOylK20G3hHBKdPC6zyMn/YyL7v2zJhUHU81nFQlkGXp49Ozkj3l tFVMTmvmXIaEA== From: Michael Ellerman To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Rob Herring , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/5200: update contact email In-Reply-To: <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato> References: <20200502142642.18979-1-wsa@kernel.org> <877dxsdl5e.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato> Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 16:22:33 +1000 Message-ID: <87imh9d1li.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Wolfram Sang writes: >> > My 'pengutronix' address is defunct for years. Merge the entries and use >> > the proper contact address. >> >> Is there any point adding the new address? It's just likely to bit-rot >> one day too. > > At least, this one is a group address, not an individual one, so less > likey. > >> I figure the git history is a better source for more up-to-date emails. > > But yes, can still be argued. I won't persist if you don't like it. That's fine, I'll merge this. You've already gone to the trouble to send it and it's better than what we have now. cheers