All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add query-qemu-capabilities
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:50:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imx8uu99.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222153254.22739-1-stefanha@redhat.com> (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:32:54 +0000")

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:

> QMP clients can usually detect the presence of features via schema
> introspection.  There are rare features that do not involve schema
> changes and are therefore impossible to detect with schema
> introspection.
>
> This patch adds the query-qemu-capabilities command.  It returns a list
> of capabilities that this QEMU supports.

The name "capabilities" could be confusing, because we already have QMP
capabilities, complete with command qmp_capabilities.  Would "features"
work?

> The decision to make this a command rather than something statically
> defined in the schema is intentional.  It allows QEMU to decide which
> capabilities are available at runtime, if necessary.
>
> This new interface is necessary so that QMP clients can discover that
> migrating disk image files is safe with cache.direct=off on Linux.
> There is no other way to detect whether or not QEMU supports this.

I think what's unsaid here is that we don't want to make a completely
arbitrary schema change just to carry this bit of information.  We
could, but we don't want to.  Correct?

>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  qapi/misc.json | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  qmp.c          | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/qapi/misc.json b/qapi/misc.json
> index 8b3ca4fdd3..9cf24919a3 100644
> --- a/qapi/misc.json
> +++ b/qapi/misc.json
> @@ -3051,3 +3051,45 @@
>    'data': 'NumaOptions',
>    'allow-preconfig': true
>  }
> +
> +##
> +# @QemuCapability:
> +#
> +# Capabilities that are not otherwise introspectable.
> +#
> +# @migrate-with-cache-direct-off-on-linux:
> +#  It is safe to migrate disk image files with cache.direct=off on Linux.
> +#  Previously only cache.direct=on was supported for live migration.

Somewhat unusual formatting due to long name.  I double-checked the doc
comment gets processed correctly.  Good.

> +#
> +# Since: 4.0
> +##
> +{ 'enum': 'QemuCapability',
> +  'data': [
> +    'migrate-with-cache-direct-off-on-linux'
> +  ]
> +}
> +
> +##
> +# @QemuCapabilities:
> +#
> +# Capability information.
> +#
> +# @capabilities: supported capabilities
> +#
> +# Since: 4.0
> +##
> +{ 'struct': 'QemuCapabilities',
> +  'data': { 'capabilities': ['QemuCapability'] } }
> +
> +##
> +# @query-qemu-capabilities:
> +#
> +# Return the capabilities supported by this QEMU.  Most features can be
> +# detected via schema introspection but some are not observable from the
> +# schema.  This command offers a way to check for the presence of such
> +# features.
> +#
> +# Since: 4.0
> +##
> +{ 'command': 'query-qemu-capabilities',
> +  'returns': 'QemuCapabilities' }

Capabilities are flags: either present or absent, thus effectively
boolean.  I don't have a specific reason to doubt limiting capabilities
to boolean.  However, doing QemuCapabilities like

   { 'struct': 'QemuCapabilities',
     'data': { 'migrate-with-cache-direct-off-on-linux': 'bool' } }

could grow to support other values more easily.  What do you think?

> diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
> index b92d62cd5f..91a1228be7 100644
> --- a/qmp.c
> +++ b/qmp.c
> @@ -717,3 +717,21 @@ MemoryInfo *qmp_query_memory_size_summary(Error **errp)
>  
>      return mem_info;
>  }
> +
> +QemuCapabilities *qmp_query_qemu_capabilities(Error **errp)
> +{
> +    QemuCapabilities *caps = g_new0(QemuCapabilities, 1);
> +    QemuCapabilityList **prev = &caps->capabilities;
> +    QemuCapability cap_val;
> +
> +    /* Add all QemuCapability enum values defined in the schema */
> +    for (cap_val = 0; cap_val < QEMU_CAPABILITY__MAX; cap_val++) {
> +        QemuCapabilityList *cap = g_new0(QemuCapabilityList, 1);
> +
> +        cap->value = cap_val;
> +        *prev = cap;
> +        prev = &cap->next;
> +    }
> +
> +    return caps;
> +}

All capabilities known to this build of QEMU are always present.  Okay;
no need to complicate things until we need to.  I just didn't expect it
to be this simple after the commit message's "It allows QEMU to decide
which capabilities are available at runtime, if necessary."

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-25  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22 15:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add query-qemu-capabilities Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-25  8:50 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2019-02-25  9:28   ` Peter Krempa
2019-02-25 17:40     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-26  7:44       ` Peter Krempa
2019-02-26  9:09       ` Markus Armbruster
2019-02-27 14:51         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-27 19:25           ` Markus Armbruster
2019-02-27 15:15         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-27 15:25           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-02-27 17:12             ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-25 17:06   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-02-26  7:23     ` Markus Armbruster
2019-03-08 10:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-03-08 12:15   ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87imx8uu99.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.