From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
To: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@netronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/16] bpf: functional and min/max reasoning unit tests for JMP32
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:29:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imyfa1ma.fsf@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548076553-31268-9-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Jiong Wang writes:
<snip>
> +/* BPF_RAND_SEXT_R7 contains 5 instructions, it initializes R7 into a random
> + * negative u32, and sign-extend it into 64-bit.
> + */
> +#define BPF_RAND_SEXT_R7 \
> + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, \
> + BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), \
> + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0), \
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_7, 0x80000000) \
^~~~ ',' missing
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_7, 32), \
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_7, 32),
^~~~ ',' should be removed
Apology, just found there is a minor fix on testcase that I forget to
commit before generating patch set. One ',' is missing and one ',' should
be removed as described above.
I will correct this in v3 together with other reviews if any.
Regards,
Jiong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-23 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 13:15 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/16] bpf: propose new jmp32 instructions Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/16] bpf: allocate 0x06 to new eBPF instruction class JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/16] bpf: refactor verifier min/max code for condition jump Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/16] bpf: verifier support JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/16] bpf: disassembler " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/16] tools: bpftool: teach cfg code about JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/16] bpf: interpreter support for JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/16] bpf: JIT blinds support JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/16] bpf: functional and min/max reasoning unit tests for JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-23 14:29 ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/16] x86_64: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32 Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/16] x32: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/16] arm64: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/16] arm: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/16] ppc: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-24 4:58 ` Sandipan Das
2019-01-24 9:53 ` Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/16] s390: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/16] nfp: " Jiong Wang
2019-01-21 13:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/16] selftests: bpf: makefile support sub-register code-gen test mode Jiong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87imyfa1ma.fsf@netronome.com \
--to=jiong.wang@netronome.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.