From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Keith Packard" <keithp@keithp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] anv: Support wait for heterogeneous list of fences
 [v2]
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:22:29 -0700
Message-ID: <87in6eqmju.fsf@keithp.com>
References: <20180615025256.10657-1-keithp@keithp.com>
 <20180615025256.10657-5-keithp@keithp.com>
 <CAOFGe94-8KdifZ7ZrK_2y7TrYKMpFZUm49ZfDKRUdp+XE2WWPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87lgbaqoo2.fsf@keithp.com>
 <CAOFGe97aEnKRcdmGubwL27deR=iCTM98iKYx+t46gYL5cA9wmg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1709368572=="
Return-path: <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOFGe97aEnKRcdmGubwL27deR=iCTM98iKYx+t46gYL5cA9wmg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>,
 <mailto:dri-devel-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============1709368572==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> writes:

> I suppose we probably shouldn't worry about current_time being greater th=
an
> INT64_MAX?  I guess if that happens we have pretty big problems...

Nope, we've already given up on that working -- it's a couple hundred
years of system uptime. Neither of us have any concerns in this area.

>>            timeout =3D MIN2(max_timeout, timeout);
>>
>>            return (current_time + timeout);
>>         }
>>
>
> Yeah, I think that's better.

Cool. I'll wait for further review :-)

=2D-=20
=2Dkeith

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=h8zU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============1709368572==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==

--===============1709368572==--