From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:44:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in8zw27t.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523266613394@kroah.com> (gregkh@linuxfoundation.org's message of "Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:36:53 +0200")
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
>
> signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE
>
> to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>
> The filename of the patch is:
> signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch
> and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
>
> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
The patch is a noop functionality wise so I don't see the point of
backporting it to stable.
Eric
> From foo@baz Mon Apr 9 10:16:32 CEST 2018
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 10:37:40 -0500
> Subject: signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE
>
> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
>
> [ Upstream commit b80328be53c215346b153769267b38f531d89b4f ]
>
> Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0.
> This is the same si_code as SI_USER. Posix and common sense requires
> that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code. As such this use of 0
> for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI.
>
> Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a
> value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result
> hat uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr
> field by accident but certainly not by design. Making this a very
> flakey implementation.
>
> Utilizing FPE_FIXME siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the
> appropriate fields will reliably be copied.
>
> Possible ABI fixes includee:
> - Send the signal without siginfo
> - Don't generate a signal
> - Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code
> - Don't handle cases which can't happen
>
> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> Cc: linux-metag@vger.kernel.org
> Ref: ac919f0883e5 ("metag: Traps")
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/metag/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> +++ b/arch/metag/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
> @@ -6,4 +6,11 @@
>
> #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>
> +/*
> + * SIGFPE si_codes
> + */
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +#define FPE_FIXME 0 /* Broken dup of SI_USER */
> +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> +
> #endif
> --- a/arch/metag/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/metag/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ TBIRES fpe_handler(TBIRES State, int Sig
> else if (error_state & TXSTAT_FPE_INEXACT_BIT)
> info.si_code = FPE_FLTRES;
> else
> - info.si_code = 0;
> + info.si_code = FPE_FIXME;
> info.si_errno = 0;
> info.si_addr = (__force void __user *)regs->ctx.CurrPC;
> force_sig_info(SIGFPE, &info, current);
>
>
> Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ebiederm@xmission.com are
>
> queue-4.15/signal-metag-document-a-conflict-with-si_user-with-sigfpe.patch
> queue-4.15/signal-arm-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe.patch
> queue-4.15/signal-powerpc-document-conflicts-with-si_user-and-sigfpe-and-sigtrap.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-09 9:36 Patch "signal/metag: Document a conflict with SI_USER with SIGFPE" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
2018-04-10 14:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-04-10 21:15 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87in8zw27t.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.