All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kvm: Fix single step for guest skipped instructions
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:50:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87infvxk30.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93d7d64e-e32c-0c6b-5d02-68704c1d45ba@redhat.com>


Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 04/10/2017 12:08, Alex Benn?e wrote:
>>
>> From 2e8fcea695a9eca67fbeb331d3104d1d9e7e337a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Alex=20Benn=C3=A9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:49:41 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] kvm: exit run loop after emulating IO when single stepping
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>>
>> If single-stepping is enabled we should exit the run-loop after
>> emulating the access. Otherwise single-stepping across emulated IO
>> accesses may skip an instruction.
>>
>> This only addresses user-space emulation. Stuff done in kernel-mode
>> should be handled there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> index 90c88b517d..85bcb2b0d4 100644
>> --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -1940,7 +1940,7 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>>                            run->io.direction,
>>                            run->io.size,
>>                            run->io.count);
>> -            ret = 0;
>> +            ret = cpu->singlestep_enabled ? EXCP_DEBUG : 0;
>>              break;
>>          case KVM_EXIT_MMIO:
>>              DPRINTF("handle_mmio\n");
>> @@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>>                               run->mmio.data,
>>                               run->mmio.len,
>>                               run->mmio.is_write);
>> -            ret = 0;
>> +            ret = cpu->singlestep_enabled ? EXCP_DEBUG : 0;
>>              break;
>>          case KVM_EXIT_IRQ_WINDOW_OPEN:
>>              DPRINTF("irq_window_open\n");
>
> Singlestep mode doesn't make much sense for KVM.  For TCG the purpose is
> to build one-instruction translation blocks, but what would it mean for KVM?

It's used by the kvm_arch_handle_debug() code to verify single-stepping
is enabled when processing debug exceptions. And also kvm_update_debug:

    if (cpu->singlestep_enabled) {
        data.dbg.control |= KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE | KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP;
    }

We also have an aliased singlestep_enabled in our disas_context for the
translator.

--
Alex Benn?e

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-04 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-30  9:01 [PATCH 0/3] Fix single step for traps Julien Thierry
2017-08-30  9:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: Use existing defines for mdscr Julien Thierry
2017-08-30  9:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Fix single stepping in kernel traps Julien Thierry
2017-08-30  9:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kvm: Fix single step for guest skipped instructions Julien Thierry
2017-08-30  9:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-30  9:40     ` Julien Thierry
2017-08-30 18:53   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-31  8:45     ` Julien Thierry
2017-08-31  8:54       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-31  9:37         ` Julien Thierry
2017-08-31 10:53           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-31 12:56             ` Julien Thierry
2017-08-31 13:28               ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-31 13:57                 ` Julien Thierry
2017-08-31 14:01                   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-09-29 12:38                     ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-03 14:57                       ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-03 15:07                         ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-03 15:48                           ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-03 16:17                             ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-03 16:30                           ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-03 17:08                             ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-03 17:26                               ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-04  8:07                                 ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-04 10:08                                   ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-04 10:28                                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-04 10:50                                       ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-10-04 14:19                                         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-10-04 10:42                                     ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-04 15:42                                       ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-04 16:10                                         ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-04 18:23                                           ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87infvxk30.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.