From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751675AbdITRRO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:17:14 -0400
Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36260 "EHLO
        foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751175AbdITRRN (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:17:13 -0400
References: <20170808095519.10077-1-brendan.jackman@arm.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.1
From: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
        Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Sync task util before slow-path wakeup
In-reply-to: <20170808095519.10077-1-brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:17:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87ingdi92n.fsf@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Peter,

Ping.

Log of previous discussion: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9876769/

Cheers,
Brendan

On Tue, Aug 08 2017 at 09:55, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> We use task_util in find_idlest_group via capacity_spare_wake. This
> task_util is updated in wake_cap. However wake_cap is not the only
> reason for ending up in find_idlest_group - we could have been sent
> there by wake_wide. So explicitly sync the task util with prev_cpu
> when we are about to head to find_idlest_group.
>
> We could simply do this at the beginning of
> select_task_rq_fair (i.e. irrespective of whether we're heading to
> select_idle_sibling or find_idlest_group & co), but I didn't want to
> slow down the select_idle_sibling path more than necessary.
>
> Don't do this during fork balancing, we won't need the task_util and
> we'd just clobber the last_update_time, which is supposed to be 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>
> changes v1 -> v2: Just cosmetic
>
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c95880e216f6..20275178604d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5913,8 +5913,17 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
>  			new_cpu = cpu;
>  	}
>
> +	if (sd && !(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_FORK)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We're going to need the task's util for capacity_spare_wake
> +		 * in find_idlest_group. Sync it up to prev_cpu's
> +		 * last_update_time.
> +		 */
> +		sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!sd) {
> - pick_cpu:
> +pick_cpu:
>  		if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) /* XXX always ? */
>  			new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);