From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
Mathias Kresin <dev@kresin.me>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Serge Vasilugin <vasilugin@yandex.ru>,
Roman Yeryomin <roman@advem.lv>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 10:12:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inkxwc9n.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3Y7rCvmJo062-5G07HGiT6x2MtvVV=dQAVBK0AiX0U_A@mail.gmail.com> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 19 May 2017 08:55:21 +0200")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined
>> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:262:13:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_write' used but never defined
>> static void rt2800_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>> CC [M]
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.o
>> In file included from
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c:43:0:
>> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:259:11:
>> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' declared 'static' but never defined
>> [-Wunused-function]
>> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
>> ^
>
> On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict
> against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I don't see
> the warning and also see no reference to rt2800_bbp_read in rt2800lib.h
I did a test build with current wireless-drivers-next and I also don't
see any warnings.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-19 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 14:46 [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] rt2x00: change function pointers " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-24 13:46 ` [v2, " Kalle Valo
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] rt2x00: convert rt2800_rfcsr_read return type Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] rt2x00: convert rt2x00_rf_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] rt2x00: convert rt2x00mmio_register_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] rt2x00: convert rt2x00usb_register_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] rt2x00: convert rt2800_register_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] rt2x00: convert rt2*_bbp_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] rt2x00: convert rt2x00_eeprom_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] rt2x00: convert rt2800_eeprom_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-17 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] rt2x00: convert rt2x00_desc_read " Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-19 5:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors Kalle Valo
2017-05-19 5:18 ` Kalle Valo
2017-05-19 6:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-19 7:15 ` Kalle Valo
2017-05-19 7:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAKR_QVJGxWF8+ZGGn08XiOgpYVGSjwQwqJoP10fY_bjfRg-uzw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-19 6:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-19 6:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-19 7:12 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
[not found] ` <CAKR_QVLf5Yn3En2DD4Pwbc2+EKaO9xGB0qU3MWQrNWNjZkx1CA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-19 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-22 18:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-22 18:03 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87inkxwc9n.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@kresin.me \
--cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pozega.tomislav@gmail.com \
--cc=roman@advem.lv \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=vasilugin@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.