From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
lvivier@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration: Create block capabilities for shared and enable
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:06:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inl2drzj.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r2zqqged.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (Markus Armbruster's message of "Mon, 15 May 2017 17:38:34 +0200")
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 05/15/2017 04:46 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>>> * Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>> Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 05/11/2017 11:32 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>>>> Those two capabilities were added through the command line. Notice that
>>>>>> we just created them. This is just the boilerplate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Make migrate_set_block_* take a boolean argument.
>>>>>
>>>>> Question - do we support the orthogonal selection of all 4 combinations
>>>>> under HMP 'migrate' (no argument, -b alone, -i alone, -b and -i
>>>>> together), or are there only 3 actual states? If the latter, should we
>>>>> represent this as a single enum-valued property, rather than as two
>>>>> independent boolean properties?
>>>>
>>>> { 'enum': 'MigrationCapability',
>>>> 'data': ['xbzrle', 'rdma-pin-all', 'auto-converge', 'zero-blocks',
>>>> 'compress', 'events', 'postcopy-ram', 'x-colo', 'release-ram'] }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that we can only have boolean capabilities here.
>>>> Or, how could we put a non-boolean capability?
>>
>> If we want a non-boolean, then we make it a migration parameter rather
>> than a migration capability. There may be other advantages to using
>> MigrationParameter instead of MigrationCapability (such as making it
>> easier to figure out whether the parameter settings are persistent or
>> apply per-migration).
>
> What makes a migration knob a MigrationCapability rather than a
> MigrationParameter? Type bool, or is there more to it?
I didn't started this, but *my* undersanding:
Migration capability: we have to set this up before migration starts.
It is like a property that we can't change later. We can't add a
compression thread in the middle of migration (notice that we "could"
but current code can't).
So, block enabled migration is a capability.
Block shared on the other hand is weird. *My* understading of the code
is that we have a qcow2 overlay on top of the base image, and:
- without shared: we migrate all the block device
- with shared: we migrate only the top overlay
So, thisk could be a parameter of block migration. If anyone understand
better than me, please stand up.
>>> Lets keep this simple and stick with the booleans.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>> There are three states as far as I can see.
>
> Begs the question how the fourth state behaves. Documentation is of no
> help:
>
> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> index 5728b7f..109852e 100644
> --- a/qapi-schema.json
> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -894,11 +894,16 @@
> # @release-ram: if enabled, qemu will free the migrated ram pages on the source
> # during postcopy-ram migration. (since 2.9)
> #
> +# @block-enabled: enable block migration (Since 2.10)
> +#
> +# @block-shared: enable block shared migration (Since 2.10)
> +#
> # Since: 1.2
> ##
>
> Please explain all four states clearly there.
Is the previous explanation enough?
>> I'll leave it up to you as maintainers which way you prefer, I'm just
>> offering the potential design tradeoffs for simplicity of booleans (but
>> complexity in an unused state) vs. simplicity of design (but complexity
>> in code).
>
> For what it's worth, I dislike entangled booleans.
Some here, but except if we put shared as a migration parameter, I don't
know what to do here.
{ 'enum': 'MigrationParameter',
'data': ['compress-level', 'compress-threads', 'decompress-threads',
'cpu-throttle-initial', 'cpu-throttle-increment',
'tls-creds', 'tls-hostname', 'max-bandwidth',
'downtime-limit', 'x-checkpoint-delay' ] }
I don't see either how to define that block_shared will be a boolean parameter.
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-15 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 16:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Remove old MigrationParams Juan Quintela
2017-05-11 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration: Create block capabilities for shared and enable Juan Quintela
2017-05-12 19:52 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-15 9:41 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 9:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-15 14:24 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-15 15:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-15 16:06 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2017-05-16 6:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-15 15:56 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-11 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] migration: Remove use of old MigrationParams Juan Quintela
2017-05-12 3:40 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-12 10:55 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-12 19:59 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-15 9:48 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 10:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-15 14:28 ` Eric Blake
2017-05-15 15:59 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 16:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-15 16:33 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 16:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-15 16:56 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 17:27 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-15 17:35 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 17:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-15 17:45 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 18:32 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-05-16 7:25 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-16 8:00 ` Juan Quintela
2017-05-15 10:05 ` Peter Xu
2017-05-11 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: Remove " Juan Quintela
2017-05-12 2:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Hailiang Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-25 10:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH " Juan Quintela
2017-04-25 10:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration: Create block capabilities for shared and enable Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87inl2drzj.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.