From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 16:04:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87inmlnqx1.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87tw7axlr0.fsf@xmission.com> <87d1dyw5iw.fsf@xmission.com> <87tw7aunuh.fsf@xmission.com> <87lgsmunmj.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20170304170312.GB13131@redhat.com> <8760ir192p.fsf@xmission.com> <878tnkpv8h.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <87vaqooggs.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20170402153517.GA12637@redhat.com> <877f32k5ew.fsf@xmission.com> <20170403181252.GA31390@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170403181252.GA31390@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:12:52 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Aleksa Sarai , Andy Lutomirski , Attila Fazekas , Jann Horn , Kees Cook , Michal Hocko , Ulrich Obergfell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov writes: > On 04/02, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Oleg Nesterov writes: >> >> > And btw zap_other_threads(may_hang == 0) is racy. Either you need tasklist or >> > exit_notify() should set tsk->exit_state under siglock, otherwise zap() can >> > return the wrong count. >> >> zap_other_thread(tsk, 0) only gets called in the case where we don't >> care about the return value. It does not get called from fs/exec.c > > I meant that may_hang == 0 implies zap_other_threads(do_count => -1) which should > return the number of threads which didn't pass exit_notify(). The returned value > can be wrong unless you change exit_notify() to set exit_state under > siglock. Interesting an existing bug. I won't deny that one. Subtle to catch but easy enough to fix. Eric