From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerry Snitselaar Subject: crb state transition question Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:09:40 -0700 Message-ID: <87inmy6zm3.fsf@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: tpmdd-devel , Jarkko Sakkinen , "Winkler, Tomas" , Jiandi An List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net How closely should the driver adhere to the state transitions documented in the ptp spec? I think in an earlier patch Tomas mentioned that PTT (at least some versions) was handling idle state management itself. With something other than PTT coming along to use crb, I'm wondering if we should be doing something like crb_cmd_ready at the beginning of crb_send, and crb_go_idle at the end of crb_recv. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot