All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Wait for end transfer complete before free irq
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:51:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inswvg80.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4ku+5h26qA4UDXi=WDcany6z_FAK=ie7w93nyDY9-wkz0hg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2191 bytes --]


Hi,

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 13 October 2016 at 15:02, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> writes:
>>> @@ -1742,6 +1791,17 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_stop(struct usb_gadget *g)
>>>       dwc->gadget_driver      = NULL;
>>>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags);
>>>
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * Since the xHCI will share the same interrupt with gadget, thus when
>>> +      * free the gadget irq, it will not shutdown this gadget irq line. Then
>>> +      * the gadget driver can not handle the end transfer command complete
>>> +      * event after free the gadget irq, which will hang the system to crash.
>>> +      *
>>> +      * So we should wait for the end transfer command complete event before
>>> +      * free it to avoid this situation.
>>> +      */
>>> +     dwc3_wait_command_complete(dwc);
>>
>> this doesn't make sense. We have already masked all interrupts before
>> getting here. We have also, already, disabled all endpoints.
>
> No, you just mask the interrupts described in DEVTEN register, and you
> did not disable the endpoint command complete event.

True that

>> I'm thinking this is a bug in configfs interface of Gadget API, not
>> dwc3. The only reason for this to happen would be if we get to
>> ->udc_stop() with endpoints still enabled.
>>
>> Can you check if that's the case? i.e. can you check if any endpoints
>> are still enabled when we get here?
>
> No, it is not any endpoints are still enabled. Like I said in commit
> message, we will start end transfer command when disable the endpoint,
> if the end transfer command complete event comes after we have freed
> the gadget irq, it will trigger the interrupt line all the time to
> crash the system.

I see what the problem is. Databook tells us we *must* set CMDIOC when
issuing EndTransfer command and we should always wait for Command
Complete IRQ. However, we took a shortcut and just delayed for 100us
after issuing End Transfer.

It seems as if *that* should be fixed. We should start actually waiting
for Command Complete IRQ.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 800 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-12 11:37 [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Wait for end transfer complete before free irq Baolin Wang
2016-10-13  7:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-13  7:34   ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-13  7:51     ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-10-13  8:00       ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-13  9:55         ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-13 10:56           ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-13 11:16             ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-13 11:23               ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-13 12:41                 ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-13 13:34                   ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-14  7:03                     ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-14  7:46                       ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-14  9:10                         ` Baolin Wang
2016-10-14  9:50                           ` Felipe Balbi
2016-10-14 14:36                         ` Alan Stern
2016-10-17  8:10                           ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87inswvg80.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.