From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:03:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87io2hem69.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87twm1g1go.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolai Stange's message of "Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:47:51 +0100")
The official constraints on constant expressions [6.6] are insanely
strict in that they do not allow some constructs commonly used in the
wild.
Relax them by treating
- address constants cast to different pointer type as address constants
again,
- address constants cast to integer type as integer constant
expressions
- conditional expressions whose true and false branches both yield
address constants as address constants,
- and conditional expressions whose condition is an address constant
as an constant expression to the extent their true and false branches
allow.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index d32f5a4..2b60294 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1125,14 +1125,23 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_conditional_expression(struct expression *expr)
true = &expr->cond_true;
}
- expr->flags = (expr->conditional->flags & (*true)->flags &
- expr->cond_false->flags);
- expr_flags_decay_consts(&expr->flags);
/*
+ * A conditional operator yields a particular constant
+ * expression type only if all of its three subexpressions are
+ * of that type [6.6(6), 6.6(8)].
+ * As an extension, relax this restriction by allowing any
+ * constant expression type for the condition expression.
+ *
* A conditional operator never yields an address constant
* [6.6(9)].
+ * However, as an extension, if the condition is any constant
+ * expression, and the true and false expressions are both
+ * address constants, mark the result as an address constant.
*/
- expr_clear_flag(&expr->flags, EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR);
+ if (expr->conditional->flags & (EXPR_FLAG_ARITH_CONST_EXPR |
+ EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR))
+ expr->flags = (*true)->flags &expr->cond_false->flags;
+ expr_flags_decay_consts(&expr->flags);
lclass = classify_type(ltype, <ype);
rclass = classify_type(rtype, &rtype);
@@ -2783,14 +2792,30 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
/*
* Casts of integer literals to pointer type yield
* address constants [6.6(9)].
+ *
+ * As an extension, treat address constants cast to a
+ * different pointer type as adress constants again.
+ *
+ * As another extension, treat integer constant
+ * expressions (in contrast to literals) cast to
+ * pointer type as address constants.
*/
if (class1 & TYPE_PTR &&
- (target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST)) {
+ ((target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR) ||
+ (target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR))) {
expr_set_flag(&expr->flags, EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR);
+
}
} else {
expr->flags = target->flags;
expr_flags_decay_consts(&expr->flags);
+
+ /*
+ * As an extension, treat address constants cast to
+ * integer type as an arithmetic constant.
+ */
+ if (expr->flags & EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR)
+ expr_set_flag(&expr->flags, EXPR_FLAG_ARITH_CONST_EXPR);
/*
* Casts to numeric types never result in address
* constants [6.6(9)].
--
2.7.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 14:47 [PATCH v2 00/13] improve constexpr handling Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] expression: introduce additional expression constness tracking flags Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 21:51 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 15:26 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 15:37 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] expression: examine constness of casts at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 22:02 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 16:11 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] expression: examine constness of binops and alike " Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 0:14 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 15:50 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 17:24 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-27 10:42 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-27 18:00 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 0:59 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] expression: examine constness of preops " Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:10 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] expression: examine constness of conditionals " Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:16 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] expression, evaluate: add support for recognizing address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:27 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 3:10 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] evaluate: check static storage duration objects' intializers' constness Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:42 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 16:08 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 17:56 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-26 20:18 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 3:00 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] expression: recognize references to labels as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:45 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 15:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] expression: examine constness of __builtin_offsetof at evaluation only Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 1:57 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-02-01 3:06 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-01-25 15:02 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] symbol: flag builtins constant_p, safe_p and warning as constexprs Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 2:00 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 15:03 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2016-01-26 2:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] expression, evaluate: support compound literals as address constants Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 2:07 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 15:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] symbol: do not inherit storage modifiers from base types at examination Nicolai Stange
2016-01-26 2:54 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] improve constexpr handling Luc Van Oostenryck
2016-01-25 21:26 ` Nicolai Stange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87io2hem69.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.