From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zen.linaro.local ([81.128.185.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q141sm3989285wmg.3.2015.10.29.08.11.46 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zen.linaro.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaro.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5883E03C9; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:11:45 +0000 (GMT) References: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.50.4 From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Andrew Jones Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list In-reply-to: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:11:45 +0000 Message-ID: <87io5pwvym.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUID: wg8cb4hJj5KF Andrew Jones writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a >> qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc >> and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the >> list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as >> a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff >> out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be >> cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) >> >> Any objections/opinions? > > FWIW, I like the idea. Although I have no objections to the idea. > > notmuch tag +qemu-arm -- tag:new \ > and to:qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ > and \( subject:arm or subject:aarch64 \) > > also seems to work pretty well for me. Funnily enough for mu I have the something similar: list:qemu-devel.nongnu.org AND (aarch64 OR arm64 OR A64) > > Thanks, > drew -- Alex Bennée From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zrorn-0006l0-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zrork-0003xu-Qd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:34065) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zrork-0003xq-FP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:11:48 -0400 Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so287549146wik.1 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:11:47 -0700 (PDT) References: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:11:45 +0000 Message-ID: <87io5pwvym.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrew Jones Cc: Peter Maydell , Peter Crosthwaite , Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , "Edgar E. Iglesias" Andrew Jones writes: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a >> qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc >> and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the >> list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as >> a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff >> out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be >> cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) >> >> Any objections/opinions? > > FWIW, I like the idea. Although I have no objections to the idea. > > notmuch tag +qemu-arm -- tag:new \ > and to:qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ > and \( subject:arm or subject:aarch64 \) > > also seems to work pretty well for me. Funnily enough for mu I have the something similar: list:qemu-devel.nongnu.org AND (aarch64 OR arm64 OR A64) > > Thanks, > drew -- Alex Bennée