From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757194AbaIDCmy (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:42:54 -0400 Received: from LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.121]:46238 "EHLO lgemrelse6q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756417AbaIDCmx (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:42:53 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Shuah Khan , Tom Zanussi , Yoshihiro YUNOMAE , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] ftrace: Add a ftrace test collection References: <20140902110632.3207.20043.stgit@kbuild-f20.novalocal> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 11:42:51 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20140902110632.3207.20043.stgit@kbuild-f20.novalocal> (Masami Hiramatsu's message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:06:32 +0000") Message-ID: <87iol49kd0.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:06:32 +0000, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the collection of testcases for ftrace version 3. > This is just some updates and fixes according to the > discussion at previous version. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/26/304 > > The major updates are: > - Fix some expressions to work on dash (Thanks Luis!) > - Support UNRESOLVED/UNTESTED/UNSUPPORTED results for testcase. > Those are POSIX 1003.3 standard. > (see http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/manual/x47.html for > more details) > - Fix to show error logs. > > ftracetest is a small dash script for testing ftrace features. > It will be required to add a unit test for each new feature > after this is merged, because of preventing feature regressions. > > This version still be out of the selftest. However, at the kernel > summit, I talked with Shuah about that. And since the kselftest > will be the standard kernel unit test framework, I agreed to > move this under the selftest. But I also would like to ask Steven > and Namhyung to agree with it before moving. > > Actually, since we've already has similar shell-script base > testcase under kselftest, we can easily move this under > selftests. By [k]selftest, did you mean tools/testing/selftests/ ? Anyway I have no objection to the move. Thanks for your work! Namhyung