From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2 1/2] virtio-net: don't respond to cpu hotplug notifier if we're not ready Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:47:14 +1030 Message-ID: <87iowvje6t.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <8738o0aj9u.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20131017050710.GA12141@redhat.com> <87d2n3s89s.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20131017.234816.1960399038382112445.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131017.234816.1960399038382112445.davem@davemloft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: David Miller Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org David Miller writes: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:15 +1030 > >> Asking people to express 'CC: stable' in words is error-prone; if Dave >> wants to filter it, he's quite capable. > > Filtering it one time is one thing. > > Potentially acting on that filter 100 or so times a day... > > That's completely another. I don't see the difference between reacting to: > The patch were need for 3.10 and above. And: CC: stable@kernel.org # 3.10+ Except the latter is the standard form which everyone else uses. Do you want awk script to turn the latter into the former? Would that really help? Confused, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751532Ab3JRGbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:31:47 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:43464 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751421Ab3JRGbp (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:31:45 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: David Miller Cc: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2 1/2] virtio-net: don't respond to cpu hotplug notifier if we're not ready In-Reply-To: <20131017.234816.1960399038382112445.davem@davemloft.net> References: <8738o0aj9u.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20131017050710.GA12141@redhat.com> <87d2n3s89s.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20131017.234816.1960399038382112445.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+81~gd2c8818 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:47:14 +1030 Message-ID: <87iowvje6t.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:15 +1030 > >> Asking people to express 'CC: stable' in words is error-prone; if Dave >> wants to filter it, he's quite capable. > > Filtering it one time is one thing. > > Potentially acting on that filter 100 or so times a day... > > That's completely another. I don't see the difference between reacting to: > The patch were need for 3.10 and above. And: CC: stable@kernel.org # 3.10+ Except the latter is the standard form which everyone else uses. Do you want awk script to turn the latter into the former? Would that really help? Confused, Rusty.