All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus <paulus@samba.org>,
	stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:22:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iq56yr5s.fsf@linux-g6p1.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100624142804.431553874@chello.nl>

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:28:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> These patches prepare the perf code for multiple pmus (no user
> interface yet, Lin Ming is working on that). These patches remove all
> weak functions and rework the struct pmu interface.
> 
> The patches are boot tested on x86_64 and compile tested on: powerpc
> (!fsl, what config is that?), sparc and arm (sorry no SH compiler)

Hi Peter,

I tried your SH changes and I needed to apply this patch to get it to
compile. I haven't run the code yet, but I'll do that later today.

---

diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
index 50ff852..6bfbaec 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void sh_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 }
 
-static int sh_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+static int sh_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void sh_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 	sh_perf_event_update(event, &event->hw, event->hw.idx);
 }
 
-static in sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
+static int sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err = __hw_perf_event_init(event);
 	if (unlikely(err)) {
@@ -345,15 +345,15 @@ sh_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
-int __cpuinit register_sh_pmu(struct sh_pmu *pmu)
+int __cpuinit register_sh_pmu(struct sh_pmu *_pmu)
 {
 	if (sh_pmu)
 		return -EBUSY;
-	sh_pmu = pmu;
+	sh_pmu = _pmu;
 
-	pr_info("Performance Events: %s support registered\n", pmu->name);
+	pr_info("Performance Events: %s support registered\n", _pmu->name);
 
-	WARN_ON(pmu->num_events > MAX_HWEVENTS);
+	WARN_ON(_pmu->num_events > MAX_HWEVENTS);
 
 	perf_pmu_register(&pmu);
 	perf_cpu_notifier(sh_pmu_notifier);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-26 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24 14:28 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Fix Nehalem PMU quirk Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf: Fix argument of perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf, sparc64: Fix maybe_change_configuration() PCR setting Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-28 13:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-28 15:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-28 15:29       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-09  3:08   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09  8:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  7:31   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09  8:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 14:49   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:00       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:03       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 16:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:07           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 18:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:11               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 18:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:21                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:06   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:37   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 16:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:09       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-25 11:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2 Will Deacon
2010-06-25 11:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-25 14:36     ` Will Deacon
2010-06-25 14:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 14:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 15:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 15:31             ` MattFleming
2010-07-01 15:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 16:04                 ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-02  2:57                 ` Paul Mundt
2010-07-02  9:52                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-05 11:14                     ` Paul Mundt
2010-07-08 11:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 11:19                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-18 19:37                     ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-02 12:55           ` Will Deacon
2010-06-26 11:22 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2010-06-26 16:22 ` Corey Ashford
2010-06-28 15:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-30 17:19     ` Corey Ashford
2010-06-30 18:11       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iq56yr5s.fsf@linux-g6p1.site \
    --to=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.