From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Sender: Alexis Berlemont References: <9c789a000902160455k7dcae1d2tc151b12df6140ec0@domain.hid> <200902170940.54910.peter.soetens@domain.hid> <499A8636.5020100@domain.hid> <200902171208.07297.peter.soetens@domain.hid> <87y6w4r167.fsf@domain.hid> <499BBB08.5060801@domain.hid> From: Alexis Berlemont Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:43:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <499BBB08.5060801@domain.hid> (Jan Kiszka's message of "Wed\, 18 Feb 2009 08\:38\:48 +0100") Message-ID: <87iqn7qpj7.fsf@domain.hid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Comedi drivers in Xenomai porting/integration status ? List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Hi, >> That was the reason why, I was really suprised to find Comedi >> integrated into the mainline kernel. What strikes me more is that >> Comedi seems to be left as is. Do you think, it will be cleaned up or >> reworked ? > > Without rework Comedi will not make into mainline (I wouldn't call the > staging corner "mainline"). And when reading this > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/793476, it is probably the > best time now to propose interface changes and contribute back > improvements made for the RTDM rework. How would you proceed ? Maybe, the first step would be to ask on the Comedi mailing-list if someone is interested in discussing on the API rework. Maybe, someone will answer this time. Alexis.