All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@intel.com>,
	"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@intel.com>,
	"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Chris Wright" <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
	<tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] TXT: ACPI AddressRangeUnusuable support
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:54:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iqs3lxdz.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB0892005AC105D@orsmsx416.amr.corp.intel.com> (Joseph Cihula's message of "Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:34:47 -0700")

"Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com> writes:
> +#define E820_UNUSABLE	5
>  
>  /* reserved RAM used by kernel itself */
>  #define E820_RESERVED_KERN        128
>
> From: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Something got corrupted? Your patch contains a mailbox with another
version of the patch.

> Subject: - acpi-add-support-for-addressrangeunusuable-acpi-memory-type.patch removed from -mm tree
> To: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>,
> 	<andi@firstfloor.org>,
> 	"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@intel.com>,
> 	<mingo@elte.hu>,
> 	"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@intel.com>,
> 	<tglx@linutronix.de>,
> 	<mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:44:49 -0700
>
>
> The patch titled
>      acpi: add support for AddressRangeUnusuable ACPI memory type
> has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
>      acpi-add-support-for-addressrangeunusuable-acpi-memory-type.patch

-Andi
-- 
ak@linux.intel.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-08  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-07 20:34 [RFC][PATCH 1/3] TXT: ACPI AddressRangeUnusuable support Cihula, Joseph
2008-10-08  0:54 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-10-08  4:32   ` Cihula, Joseph
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-07 22:57 Joseph Cihula
2008-10-07 23:40 ` Joseph Cihula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iqs3lxdz.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
    --cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=joseph.cihula@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.