From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1IqvIG-0002i0-Qj for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:42:56 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqvIF-0002eJ-BK for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:42:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqvIB-0002Y5-L7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:42:52 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqvIB-0002XP-E6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:42:51 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.28]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IqvIA-0007oL-Pi for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 13:42:51 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAAIgnPZ017744 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:42:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20070703175316.GA2306@ws3.vdp.com> <87ps2kfuza.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20070722155546.GB2272@ws3.vdp.com> <87bqe4csu9.fsf@xs4all.nl> <20070722163452.GA2311@ws3.vdp.com> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 19:43:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20070722163452.GA2311@ws3.vdp.com> (bean123ch@gmail.com's message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:34:52 +0800") Message-ID: <87ir4aaqlw.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: Standalone problem to test syntax rules X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:42:55 -0000 Bean writes: >> In the tarball? > > Yes. Could you send the files to the list as attachments? Or whatever is relevant. tarballs on a mailinglist are very inconvenient. :-/ -- Marco