From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Segaud <matt@minas-morgul.org>
Subject: Crypto(compress) plugin stability
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:29:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87isbogqfs.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20235-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com


Hi !

I've got a question about Reiser4 encryption ? Is it stable enough to run
other things than test run or benchmarks ? :)

I'm curently running my desktop box with several partitions encrypted thru
dm-crypt. I know pros of Reiser4, which are: encryption at flush time,
selection of files to be encrypted, speed of Reiser4 :)
But are there problems with this plugin ? Is it stable enough to be trustworthy ?
(I'm used to living on the bleeding edge, with my linux boxes)

I'm willing to switch but do I risk serious damages to my system :))) ?
(I know I do, but I do not stress it a lot)

Regards

-- 
Mathieu Segaud