From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Yunseong Kim <ysk@kzalloc.com>, Nam Cao <nam.cao@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Tomas Glozar <tglozar@redhat.com>,
Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] Detecting Sleep-in-Atomic Context in PREEMPT_RT via RV (Runtime Verification) monitor rtapp:sleep
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 12:14:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jyz5kuf2.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fraslu9c.fsf@yellow.woof>
> RV is not a static checker, it is a run-time checker.
>
> Just in case you are not aware yet, there is also Smatch:
> https://github.com/error27/smatch. But I can't offer much help there.
I was looking up something unrelated, and I found that Smatch does
detect this sleep-in-atomic problem:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2024/05/24/sleeping-in-atomic-warnings/
I'm not sure if its design takes PREEMPT_RT into consideration. But
seems worth having a look.
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 6:54 [Question] Detecting Sleep-in-Atomic Context in PREEMPT_RT via RV (Runtime Verification) monitor rtapp:sleep Yunseong Kim
2025-10-27 12:20 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-10-28 22:53 ` Yunseong Kim
2025-10-29 9:24 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-11-05 9:10 ` Nam Cao
2025-12-02 11:14 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2025-12-02 11:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-12-11 4:30 ` Yunseong Kim
2025-12-11 5:42 ` Nam Cao
2025-12-11 7:58 ` Yunseong Kim
2025-12-22 7:40 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-12-23 14:31 ` Yunseong Kim
2025-12-23 15:21 ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-12-12 7:02 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jyz5kuf2.fsf@yellow.woof \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nam.cao@linaro.org \
--cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglozar@redhat.com \
--cc=ysk@kzalloc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.