All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com>
Cc: <mhiramat@kernel.org>,  <oleg@redhat.com>,  <andrii@kernel.org>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>,  <mingo@redhat.com>,  <acme@kernel.org>,
	<namhyung@kernel.org>,  <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,  <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	<irogers@google.com>,  <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,  <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,  <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Improve the usage of xol slots for better scalability
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 05:25:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzf9b12w.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240918012752.2045713-1-liaochang1@huawei.com> (Liao Chang's message of "Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:27:52 +0000")

Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> writes:
> +
> +/*
> + * xol_recycle_insn_slot - recycle a slot from the garbage collection list.
> + */
> +static int xol_recycle_insn_slot(struct xol_area *area)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	int slot = UINSNS_PER_PAGE;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(utask, &area->gc_list, gc) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The utask associated slot is in-use or recycling when
> +		 * utask associated slot_ref is not one.
> +		 */
> +		if (test_and_put_task_slot(utask)) {
> +			slot = utask->insn_slot;
> +			utask->insn_slot = UINSNS_PER_PAGE;
> +			clear_bit(slot, area->bitmap);
> +			atomic_dec(&area->slot_count);
> +			get_task_slot(utask);

Doesn't this need some annotation to make ThreadSanitizer happy?
Would be good to have some commentary why doing so
many write operations with merely a rcu_read_lock as protection is safe.
It might be safer to put some write type operations under a real lock. 
Also it is unclear how the RCU grace period for utasks is enforced.


-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-18 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-18  1:27 [PATCH] uprobes: Improve the usage of xol slots for better scalability Liao Chang
2024-09-18 12:25 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2024-09-19 12:20   ` Liao, Chang
2024-09-19 13:34     ` Andi Kleen
2024-09-23 10:29       ` Liao, Chang
2024-09-23 23:52         ` Andi Kleen
2024-09-27 10:01           ` Liao, Chang
2024-09-18 14:41 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzf9b12w.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=liaochang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.