From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F50C2BBCA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Z08Q+ITwk6z0OJeCtAIG4Lm+BOA7wQKDVnRRdeS2K+U=; b=YoqB87+q2bh8PZD1Ty67xNGihq J98XC9gAQnPPJaG3H8KqGWl4vM8IFqFEQM64kUaB+afXRlZ/0WWpR70DGIXpq983DWZsPic1RqB9S /jTS906+dxGYlRaHuBO8ZLKrSbU0CALHNIMOOErTGo8XIbtPW+xzg0OvOnIvbL+r50SnYbxNC11fv 8T94VIljLxZgmVyKKI53UH/sh9iTBE/ZB/VQf+/QPxHm/azPFebWqSs+DyKaRq7FPmnx1zf6/NzJm Rhw9FYz7WdNv2dB1TJL9ha7xcoIRuFVN9Ce7ardXp4mxI5QlCneaKYi+01n8QBMerAiij2lxUAAZa TfckDFlg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM82s-00000003W7w-0Mnc; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:25:22 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM82o-00000003W5I-3EV3 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:25:20 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468EE611EE; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A42CBC32781; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:25:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719329117; bh=8pXLi0+NE2elKsEGz3Exeg1kDvY+fHABVyxjsl7HrNI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y0UWZ99e81f92pCKDy/ylcK54a2iCMmLSB3RltsaGQs72cjZYgVQ9wGF7SKhM1LRE 6+jSqJQsQQASg4sy82IGvB8FlpAKrBeHjVaS/mnnHY6wu0AegRToWx4WD07pqBbKS3 tXIT9L/oMTdRWeoJyGjg68VZ4vQ6NA4BL9ZDihNaXQUMliXQCVNpCVHgIkfFNCI60B 26eja9WqGWkiQH67YTIAQwFvYfiKKfoiW4Xe6wafdM7zH1RBpayRmZ7jMI4TU6UT5y P9yVqxDa8mBURa5b8OVPxiuyYw5uuGQtjWx23p4czraCfdxdiPSKfMHsH5arFGaywM blOFXGQpi2lzw== From: Kalle Valo To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Jeff Johnson , Koen Vandeputte , , linux-wireless , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , , Johannes Berg , Kees Cook Subject: Re: ieee80211.h virtual_map splat References: <87o77pik7w.fsf@kernel.org> <20240625080248.32c3e03d@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:25:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20240625080248.32c3e03d@kernel.org> (Jakub Kicinski's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:02:48 -0700") Message-ID: <87jzidhwo7.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240625_082518_907545_9CCE36A9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.75 ) X-BeenThere: ath10k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+ath10k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Jakub Kicinski writes: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:56:35 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: >> > Adding netdev to the initial message in the thread. >> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPh3n83zb1PwFBFijJKChBqY95zzpYh=2iPf8tmh=YTS6e3xPw@mail.gmail.com/ >> > >> > There was some discussion in the thread, with the observation that the splat >> > is fixed by: >> > 2ae5c9248e06 ("wifi: mac80211: Use flexible array in struct ieee80211_tim_ie") >> > >> > Followed by discussion if this should be backported. >> > >> > Kees said that "netdev [...] maintainers have asked that contributors not >> > include "Cc: stable" tags, as they want to evaluate for themselves whether >> > patches should go to stable or not" >> >> BTW this rule doesn't apply to wireless subsystem. For wireless patches >> it's ok to "Cc: stable" in patches or anyone can send a request to >> stable maintainers to pick a patch. > > It's an old rule. Quoting documentation: > > Stable tree > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > > While it used to be the case that netdev submissions were not supposed > to carry explicit ``CC: stable@vger.kernel.org`` tags that is no longer > the case today. Please follow the standard stable rules in > :ref:`Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst `, > and make sure you include appropriate Fixes tags! > > See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#stable-tree Oh, I haven't noticed the change. Thanks for correcting. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches