All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, david.faust@oracle.com,
	cupertino.miranda@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: avoid casts from pointers to enums in bpf_tracing.h
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:20:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzkfuurs.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYOJRH7NMhy_kkMynWyz+mEh7ivkX05bq1bYv9aXLEg=w@mail.gmail.com> (Andrii Nakryiko's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:12:12 -0700")


> On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 12:03 PM Jose E. Marchesi
> <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> Also please check CI failures ([0]).
>> >>
>> >>   [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/8846180836/job/24291582343
>> >
>> > How weird.  This means something is going on in my local testing
>> > environment.
>>
>> Ok, I think I know what is going on: the CI failures had nothing to do
>> with the patch changes per-se, but with the fact the patch changes
>> bpf_tracing.h and a little problem in the build system.
>>
>> If I change tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h in bpf-next master, then
>> execute:
>>
>>  $ cd bpf-next/
>>  $ git clean -xf
>>  $ cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf/
>>  $ ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs
>>
>> in tools/testing/sefltests/bpf, I get this:
>>
>>   make[2]: *** No rule to make target '/home/jemarch/gnu/src/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/build/libbpflibbpfbpf_helper_defs.h', needed by '/home/jemarch/gnu/src/bpf-next/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/build/libbpf/include/bpf/libbpfbpf_helper_defs.h'.  Stop.
>>
>>
>> Same thing happens if I have a built tree and I do `make' in
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf.
>>
>> In tools/lib/bpf/Makefile there is:
>>
>>   BPF_HELPER_DEFS       := $(OUTPUT)bpf_helper_defs.h
>>
>> which assumes OUTPUT always has a trailing slash, which seems to be a
>> common expectation for OUTPUT among all the Makefiles.
>>
>> In tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile we find:
>>
>>   BPFTOOL_OUTPUT := $(OUTPUT)bpftool/
>>   DEFAULT_BPFTOOL := $(BPFTOOL_OUTPUT)bootstrap/bpftool
>>   [...]
>>   $(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(LIBBPF_SRC)/*.[ch] $(LIBBPF_SRC)/Makefile) | $(BPFOBJ_OUTPUT)
>>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(LIBBPF_SRC) OUTPUT=$(BPFOBJ_OUTPUT) \
>>                     DESTDIR=$(BPFOBJ_OUTPUT) prefix= $(abspath $@) install_headers
>>
>> which is ok because BPFTOOL_OUTPUT is defined with a trailing slash.
>>
>> However in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile an explicit value for
>> BPFTOOL_OUTPUT is specified, that lacks a trailing slash:
>>
>>   $(OUTPUT)/runqslower: $(BPFOBJ) | $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL) $(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)
>>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(TOOLSDIR)/bpf/runqslower            \
>>                     OUTPUT=$(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT) VMLINUX_BTF=$(VMLINUX_BTF)     \
>>                     BPFTOOL_OUTPUT=$(HOST_BUILD_DIR)/bpftool/                  \
>>                     BPFOBJ_OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf                          \
>>                     BPFOBJ=$(BPFOBJ) BPF_INCLUDE=$(INCLUDE_DIR)                \
>>                     EXTRA_CFLAGS='-g $(OPT_FLAGS) $(SAN_CFLAGS)'               \
>>                     EXTRA_LDFLAGS='$(SAN_LDFLAGS)' &&                          \
>>                     cp $(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)runqslower $@
>>
>> This results in a malformed
>>
>>   BPF_HELPER_DEFS       := $(OUTPUT)bpf_helper_defs.h
>>
>> in tools/lib/bpf/Makefile.
>>
>> The patch below fixes this, but there are other many possible fixes
>> (like changing tools/bpf/runqslower/Makefile in order to pass
>> OUTPUT=$(BPFOBJ_OUTPUT)/, or changing tools/lib/bpf/Makefile to use
>> $(OUTPUT)/bpf_helper_defs.h) and I don't know which one you would
>> prefer.
>>
>> Also, since the involved rules have not been changed recently, I am
>> wondering why this is being noted only now.  Is people using another
>> set-up/workflow that somehow doesn't trigger this?
>
> Let's fix runqslower submake rule, yes, but I think it's irrelevant
> here. Failures that CI caught were in samples/bpf
> (samples/bpf/tracex2.bpf.c), while this is runqslower rule.
>
> The reason you haven't caught it is because selftests/bpf/Makefile
> doesn't build samples/bpf, but our BPF CI does have an extra step to
> build samples/bpf.

Ok good to know.  Then we better start building it too as part of our
local testing.

Will look at what is going on there with this fix, and will also send a
separated patch for the Makefile.

Thanks.

>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> index ca8b73f7c774..665a5c1e9b8e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/runqslower: $(BPFOBJ) | $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL) $(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)
>>         $(Q)$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(TOOLSDIR)/bpf/runqslower            \
>>                     OUTPUT=$(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT) VMLINUX_BTF=$(VMLINUX_BTF)     \
>>                     BPFTOOL_OUTPUT=$(HOST_BUILD_DIR)/bpftool/                  \
>> -                   BPFOBJ_OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf                          \
>> +                   BPFOBJ_OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/                         \
>>                     BPFOBJ=$(BPFOBJ) BPF_INCLUDE=$(INCLUDE_DIR)                \
>>                     EXTRA_CFLAGS='-g $(OPT_FLAGS) $(SAN_CFLAGS)'               \
>>                     EXTRA_LDFLAGS='$(SAN_LDFLAGS)' &&                          \

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-30  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-26  9:22 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: avoid casts from pointers to enums in bpf_tracing.h Jose E. Marchesi
2024-04-26 16:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-26 18:02   ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-04-28 19:03     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-04-29 16:12       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-30  8:20         ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-04-26 16:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzkfuurs.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.