From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
christian.koenig@amd.com, Xinhui.Pan@amd.com,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
Nicholas Choi <nicholas.choi@amd.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
hersenxs.wu@amd.com, magalilemes00@gmail.com
Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, tales.aparecida@gmail.com,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, mwen@igalia.com,
mairacanal@riseup.net, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Isabella Basso <isabbasso@riseup.net>,
andrealmeid@riseup.net, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com>,
javierm@redhat.com, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to dc_dmub_srv library
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:12:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzmro4xa.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222155811.44096-8-Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024, Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/test/kunit/.kunitconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/test/kunit/.kunitconfig
> index eb6f81601757..4c5861ad58bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/test/kunit/.kunitconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/test/kunit/.kunitconfig
> @@ -4,5 +4,6 @@ CONFIG_DRM=y
> CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU=y
> CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC=y
> CONFIG_AMD_DC_BASICS_KUNIT_TEST=y
> +CONFIG_AMD_DC_KUNIT_TEST=y
> CONFIG_DCE_KUNIT_TEST=y
> CONFIG_DML_KUNIT_TEST=y
A bit random patch to comment on, but this hunk demonstrates the point:
Should all the configs have DRM_AMD_ prefix to put them in a
"namespace"?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 15:56 [PATCH v5 0/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit to Display Mode Library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests for fixed31_32 library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to the bw_fixed library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to display_rq_dlg_calc_20 Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to the display_mode_vba library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit to dcn20/display_mode_vba_20 library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests for dcn20_fpu Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to dc_dmub_srv library Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-02-26 11:12 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-02-28 14:42 ` Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao
2024-02-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] Documentation/gpu: Add Display Core Unit Test documentation Rodrigo Siqueira
2024-04-20 18:48 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/amd/display: Update Display Core unit tests Joao Paulo Pereira da Silva
2024-04-20 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/display: Refactor AMD display KUnit tests configs Joao Paulo Pereira da Silva
2024-04-20 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/amd/display/test: Fix kunit test that is not running Joao Paulo Pereira da Silva
2024-04-20 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/amd/display/test: Optimize kunit test suite dml_dcn20_fpu_dcn21_update_bw_bounding_box_test Joao Paulo Pereira da Silva
2024-04-20 18:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] Documentation/gpu: Update AMD Display Core Unit Test documentation Joao Paulo Pereira da Silva
2024-04-21 1:36 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/amd/display: Update Display Core unit tests Tales
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzmro4xa.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@riseup.net \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=hersenxs.wu@amd.com \
--cc=isabbasso@riseup.net \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=magalilemes00@gmail.com \
--cc=mairacanal@riseup.net \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mwen@igalia.com \
--cc=nicholas.choi@amd.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tales.aparecida@gmail.com \
--cc=twoerner@gmail.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.