From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Avoid over-length shift in arm_cpu_sve_finalize() error case
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 17:00:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzvffywd.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704154332.3014896-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> If you build QEMU with the clang sanitizer enabled, you can see it
> fire when running the arm-cpu-features test:
>
> $ QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/arm-clang/qemu-system-aarch64 ./build/arm-clang/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features
> [...]
> ../../target/arm/cpu64.c:125:19: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'unsigned long long'
> [...]
>
> This happens because the user can specify some incorrect SVE
> properties that result in our calculating a max_vq of 0. We catch
> this and error out, but before we do that we calculate
>
> vq_mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, max_vq);$
>
> and the MAKE_64BIT_MASK() call is only valid for lengths that are
> greater than zero, so we hit the undefined behaviour.
Hmm that does make me worry we could have more land mines waiting to be
found. Would converting MAKE_64BIT_MASK into an inline function and
asserting be a better solution?
>
> Change the logic so that if max_vq is 0 we specifically set vq_mask
> to 0 without going via MAKE_64BIT_MASK(). This lets us drop the
> max_vq check from the error-exit logic, because if max_vq is 0 then
> vq_map must now be 0.
>
> The UB only happens in the case where the user passed us an incorrect
> set of SVE properties, so it's not a big problem in practice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-04 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-04 15:43 [PATCH] target/arm: Avoid over-length shift in arm_cpu_sve_finalize() error case Peter Maydell
2023-07-04 15:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-04 15:57 ` Peter Maydell
2023-07-04 16:00 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2023-07-05 14:45 ` Richard Henderson
2023-07-06 10:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-05 14:36 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzvffywd.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.