All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] threads: Update PID limit comment according to futex UAPI change
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 15:26:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzxfc83l.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mt2bc9wz.ffs@tglx>

On Thu, May 11 2023 at 14:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> #define FUTEX_TID_MASK          0x3fffffff
>
> That futex mask is irrelevant because there is another limitiation for
> the PID space namely posix CPU timers:
>
> static inline clockid_t make_process_cpuclock(const unsigned int pid,
> 		                              const clockid_t clock)
> {
> 	return ((~pid) << 3) | clock;
> }
>
> That existed even before we fiddled with robust futexes and puts a hard
> limit of 29 bits on the PID space.

Actually it's worse than this. The limit is 28 bits because posix CPU
timers rely on this:

static const struct k_clock *clockid_to_kclock(const clockid_t id)
{
	clockid_t idx = id;

	if (id < 0) {
		return (id & CLOCKFD_MASK) == CLOCKFD ?
			&clock_posix_dynamic : &clock_posix_cpu;
	}
        ....

So TID must be smaller than 2^28 because if bit 28 would be set, then
the resulting clock would be positive after shift.

Sigh...


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 11:29 [PATCH] threads: Update PID limit comment according to futex UAPI change Jann Horn
2020-03-03 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-03 14:12   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-11 12:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-11 13:26       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-21 16:50 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Jann Horn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzxfc83l.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.