All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, lmb@isovalent.com, edumazet@google.com,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	andrii@kernel.org, will@isovalent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v7 11/13] bpf: sockmap, test shutdown() correctly exits epoll and recv()=0
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:04:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzxj3wsq.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502155159.305437-12-john.fastabend@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:51 AM -07, John Fastabend wrote:
> When session gracefully shutdowns epoll needs to wake up and any recv()
> readers should return 0 not the -EAGAIN they previously returned.
>
> Note we use epoll instead of select to test the epoll wake on shutdown
> event as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c        | 32 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_pass_prog.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> index 0ce25a967481..f9f611618e45 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  // Copyright (c) 2020 Cloudflare
>  #include <error.h>
>  #include <netinet/tcp.h>
> +#include <sys/epoll.h>
>  
>  #include "test_progs.h"
>  #include "test_skmsg_load_helpers.skel.h"
> @@ -9,8 +10,11 @@
>  #include "test_sockmap_invalid_update.skel.h"
>  #include "test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.skel.h"
>  #include "test_sockmap_progs_query.skel.h"
> +#include "test_sockmap_pass_prog.skel.h"
>  #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
>  
> +#include "sockmap_helpers.h"
> +
>  #define TCP_REPAIR		19	/* TCP sock is under repair right now */
>  
>  #define TCP_REPAIR_ON		1
> @@ -350,6 +354,68 @@ static void test_sockmap_progs_query(enum bpf_attach_type attach_type)
>  	test_sockmap_progs_query__destroy(skel);
>  }
>  
> +#define MAX_EVENTS 10
> +static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_shutdown(void)
> +{
> +	int n, err, map, verdict, s, c0, c1, p0, p1;
> +	struct epoll_event ev, events[MAX_EVENTS];
> +	struct test_sockmap_pass_prog *skel;
> +	int epollfd;
> +	int zero = 0;
> +	char b;
> +
> +	skel = test_sockmap_pass_prog__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	verdict = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
> +	map = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map_rx);
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict, map, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT, 0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach"))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	s = socket_loopback(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM);
> +	if (s < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +	err = create_socket_pairs(s, AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, &c0, &c1, &p0, &p1);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map, &zero, &c1, BPF_NOEXIST);
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto out_close;
> +
> +	shutdown(c0, SHUT_RDWR);
> +	shutdown(p1, SHUT_WR);
> +
> +	ev.events = EPOLLIN;
> +	ev.data.fd = c1;
> +
> +	epollfd = epoll_create1(0);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GT(epollfd, -1, "epoll_create(0)"))
> +		goto out_close;
> +	err = epoll_ctl(epollfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, c1, &ev);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_ADD)"))
> +		goto out_close;
> +	err = epoll_wait(epollfd, events, MAX_EVENTS, -1);
> +	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 1, "epoll_wait(fd)"))
> +		goto out_close;
> +
> +	n = recv(c1, &b, 1, SOCK_NONBLOCK);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "recv_timeout(fin)");
> +	n = recv(p0, &b, 1, SOCK_NONBLOCK);
> +	ASSERT_EQ(n, 0, "recv_timeout(fin)");
> +
> +out_close:
> +	close(c0);
> +	close(p0);
> +	close(c1);
> +	close(p1);
> +out:
> +	test_sockmap_pass_prog__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +

This test has me scratching my head. I don't grasp what we're testing
with (c0, p0) socket pair, since c0 is not in any sockmap?

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-08 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-02 15:51 [PATCH bpf v7 00/13] bpf sockmap fixes John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 01/13] bpf: sockmap, pass skb ownership through read_skb John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 02/13] bpf: sockmap, convert schedule_work into delayed_work John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 03/13] bpf: sockmap, reschedule is now done through backlog John Fastabend
2023-05-03  9:49   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 04/13] bpf: sockmap, improved check for empty queue John Fastabend
2023-05-04 16:53   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-04 17:42     ` John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 05/13] bpf: sockmap, handle fin correctly John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 06/13] bpf: sockmap, TCP data stall on recv before accept John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 07/13] bpf: sockmap, wake up polling after data copy John Fastabend
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 08/13] bpf: sockmap, incorrectly handling copied_seq John Fastabend
2023-05-05 12:14   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 09/13] bpf: sockmap, pull socket helpers out of listen test for general use John Fastabend
2023-05-05 17:38   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 10/13] bpf: sockmap, build helper to create connected socket pair John Fastabend
2023-05-05 17:39   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 11/13] bpf: sockmap, test shutdown() correctly exits epoll and recv()=0 John Fastabend
2023-05-08 11:04   ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2023-05-16  1:51     ` John Fastabend
2023-05-16 13:41       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 12/13] bpf: sockmap, test FIONREAD returns correct bytes in rx buffer John Fastabend
2023-05-08 11:19   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2023-05-02 15:51 ` [PATCH bpf v7 13/13] bpf: sockmap, test FIONREAD returns correct bytes in rx buffer with drops John Fastabend
2023-05-08 11:34   ` Jakub Sitnicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzxj3wsq.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=lmb@isovalent.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@isovalent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.