From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A9EC27C76 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 19:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236221AbjAYTxe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:53:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236155AbjAYTxU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:53:20 -0500 Received: from mail.fsf.org (mail.fsf.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::13]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D1775D11B for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:52:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsf.org; s=mail-fsf-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From:References; bh=ZfCcAxrf+FbiaEFSsTojjEonfI1kLo6gQ8wkIwiC/bE=; b=j1RTdQ1o8yoBhdLsK27iZUwah HLKKDSLEsdQ0tpF81rhiFhXRT6iHtKwAo1epPNbUIHuQwn5RAb9BF2jTxDNGbxObA4wcVaecaqJtv aE20LCynzXdHDnJAqTzFC2TcpikhmA5UitD63+M0DJig9RXH2JyvJEf+M/fL4fHBLlbcyHHEtOLEm YYz5xVQ7fNzzBoGTWJ6aqylWehvrEmzkF5VL4Go4RXalkYVkxNulrsKobJru+aVMLfnl64A3uCJL8 G6dKDNPxqeZo+pHI8zGWfBcWt2Rq/gZoL08igEfJgS39JCvwqXMWwX/NCiUElqkTA+8NwwNebW2Ts yUHAvwKhA==; References: <87a6271kbg.fsf@fsf.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.9.0; emacs 29.0.50 From: Ian Kelling To: Patrik Lundquist Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: balance stuck in loop on linux 6.1.7 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:48:13 -0500 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87k01afl4o.fsf@fsf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Patrik Lundquist writes: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 02:48, Ian Kelling wrote: >> >> If I restart the balance, it will take about 2.8 days to get back to the >> stuck 11% point. The balance is still running, but I'm going to cancel >> it morning unless I hear from the list that there is some use to letting >> it run since it is wearing out the mechanical drives. > > You can pause it instead of cancelling it. I ran btrfs balance pause but the command is taking a very long time. My ssh session died about half an hour after the command started for unrelated reasons, but I see the command still running 5 hours after it started. Is that normal? Balance status says: Balance on '/mnt/i' is running, pause requested